Customer Service | Help | FAQ | PEP-Easy | Report a Data Error | About
Tip: To use the Information icon…

PEP-Web Tip of the Day

The Information icon  (an i in a circle) will give you valuable information about PEP Web data and features. You can find it besides a PEP Web feature and the author’s name in every journal article. Simply move the mouse pointer over the icon and click on it for the information to appear.

For the complete list of tips, see PEP-Web Tips on the PEP-Web support page.

Stock, H.F. (1977). Meeting of the Psychoanalytic Association of New York. Psychoanal Q., 46:356-358.

(1977). Psychoanalytic Quarterly, 46:356-358

Meeting of the Psychoanalytic Association of New York

Howard F. Stock

DISCUSSION: Dr. Glenn wondered whether Dr. Niederland conceived of his "arctic dream" patient's manner of dress and his dream as reactions to the actual experience at ten or eleven months of age or as reactions to stories he may have heard later, and whether the experience had been interpreted differently at different stages of development. Since the trauma was quite early and the patient schizophrenic, Dr. Glenn asked whether the effect of the reconstruction might not have been caused by the magic of an apparently omniscient person, which led to greater faith in the analyst, rather than by integration of the reconstruction. Dr. Niederland replied that since the whole episode had been a closely guarded family secret, he did not doubt that the dream revealed the patient's memory of the real event. He agreed, however, that he first appeared as a "magician" and this later had to be worked through with the patient.

Dr. Jan Frank commented on Dr. Niederland's insight into the transference meaning of Mr. Magoo as "not seeing something." He thought his own approach would have been to press for the meaning of the heavy clothing, and noted that the stickiness of drives may often preclude any change or confirmation of the reconstruction or interpretation.

Dr. Alan Eisnitz wondered if Dr. Niederland's "arctic dream" patient's mother had actually confirmed the reconstruction because of her need to confess after the patient mentioned Dr. Niederland's remark to her. With a neurotic patient, he suggested, there might have been repeated references to the analyst not hearing, being cold, not listening, and perhaps gradually this would have uncovered the early event.

[This is a summary or excerpt from the full text of the book or article. The full text of the document is available to subscribers.]

Copyright © 2019, Psychoanalytic Electronic Publishing, ISSN 2472-6982 Customer Service | Help | FAQ | Download PEP Bibliography | Report a Data Error | About

WARNING! This text is printed for personal use. It is copyright to the journal in which it originally appeared. It is illegal to redistribute it in any form.