Customer Service | Help | FAQ | PEP-Easy | Report a Data Error | About
Tip: To save a shortcut to an article to your desktop…

PEP-Web Tip of the Day

The way you save a shortcut to an article on your desktop depends on what internet browser (and device) you are using.

  • Safari
  • Chrome
  • Internet Explorer
  • Opera


For the complete list of tips, see PEP-Web Tips on the PEP-Web support page.

Berthelsdorf, S. (1983). Meeting of the Oregon Psychoanalytic Foundation and the Oregon Psychiatric Association. Psychoanal Q., 52:155-158.

(1983). Psychoanalytic Quarterly, 52:155-158

Meeting of the Oregon Psychoanalytic Foundation and the Oregon Psychiatric Association

Siegfried Berthelsdorf

April 23, 1982. THE PROBLEM OF INTEGRITY. Leo Rangell, M.D.

The place of psychoanalysis in the intellectual life of the twentieth century, according to Dr. Rangell, stems not from its specific discoveries but from the significance of these for the general psychology of man. Referring to the premises of his recently published book, The Mind of Watergate: An Exploration of the Compromise of Integrity, Dr. Rangell suggested an analogous extension of his present findings with regard to moral conflicts. As with anxieties, phobias, depression, and neuroses, problems of integrity manifested in individual psychopathology are also of importance for their implications for a general psychology. The spread from the specific to the general, however, is often the defensive path by which the individual attempts to isolate himself from responsibility for his actions. This was the case with individual reactions to Nixon's behavior which varied from "he didn't do it" to "everyone does it." By a similar mechanism one patient's reactions alternated between anxiety and guilt about expressing anger to a defensive attitude of "doesn't everyone have that trouble?"

Dr. Rangell described at some length the methodology of his unique psychoanalytic study of the national crisis of the Watergate period. The data available to the American public, as well as the widespread defensive and distorting mechanisms by which these were received, processed, and reacted to, were observed and recorded as the events were taking place.

[This is a summary or excerpt from the full text of the book or article. The full text of the document is available to subscribers.]

Copyright © 2019, Psychoanalytic Electronic Publishing, ISSN 2472-6982 Customer Service | Help | FAQ | Download PEP Bibliography | Report a Data Error | About

WARNING! This text is printed for personal use. It is copyright to the journal in which it originally appeared. It is illegal to redistribute it in any form.