Login
Garrett, M.D. (1986). Meeting of the Psychoanalytic Association of New York. Psychoanal Q., 55:210-211.

Welcome to PEP Web!

Viewing the full text of this document requires a subscription to PEP Web.

If you are coming in from a university from a registered IP address or secure referral page you should not need to log in. Contact your university librarian in the event of problems.

If you have a personal subscription on your own account or through a Society or Institute please put your username and password in the box below. Any difficulties should be reported to your group administrator.

Username:
Password:

Can't remember your username and/or password? If you have forgotten your username and/or password please click here and log in to the PaDS database. Once there you need to fill in your email address (this must be the email address that PEP has on record for you) and click "Send." Your username and password will be sent to this email address within a few minutes. If this does not work for you please contact your group organizer.

Athens or federation user? Login here.

Not already a subscriber? Order a subscription today.

(1986). Psychoanalytic Quarterly, 55:210-211

Meeting of the Psychoanalytic Association of New York

Michael D. Garrett

DISCUSSION: Dr. Harold P. Blum praised Dr. McDougall's vivid clinical presentation and then focused his attention on present-day reassessments of earlier concepts about female sexuality. The concept of change of organ and change from active to passive assumes the female genital to be a divided genital involving the separate erotic and reproductive zones of clitoris and vagina; the current conceptualization of the female genital assumes it is a complex unity. The change of organ concept allowed for a bisexual paradigm, but it saw femininity as derived from a primary masculinity. The older concept of change of object actually described a developmental transformation from preoedipal to oedipal organization, and from dyadic to triadic object relations. Our explanatory framework is quite different today. Dr. Blum felt that Dr. McDougall's clinical presentation confirmed that her patient's narcissism was not a separate line of development, but was caught up in preoedipal and oedipal development. The patient, who appeared pursued by an overinvolved mother, was actually defending herself against her homosexual attachment to her mother. In addition to being a source of conflict, "latent homosexuality" has normal and adaptive aspects. Dr. Blum stated that "when bisexuality is normally organized so that the homosexual component is latent, subordinate, and sublimated, … it enriches the personality and the range and depth of our empathy." He took exception to Dr. McDougall's description of the early mother-child relationship as the mother "seducing" the child to live. While recognizing that Dr. McDougall did not literally mean seduction, Dr. Blum preferred Winnicott's concept of the "good enough" mother because it includes nurturance, empathy, and concern. He also questioned Dr. McDougall's reference to "identification" occurring in the first months of life; he would place it among later developmental events. Dr. Blum praised Dr. McDougall for her candid and illuminating examination of her countertransference. The analyst's countertransference here became a stimulus for self-analysis,

- 210 -

[This is a summary or excerpt from the full text of the book or article. The full text of the document is available to subscribers.]

Copyright © 2014, Psychoanalytic Electronic Publishing. Help | About | Download PEP Bibliography | Report a Problem

WARNING! This text is printed for the personal use of the subscriber to PEP Web and is copyright to the Journal in which it originally appeared. It is illegal to copy, distribute or circulate it in any form whatsoever.