Customer Service | Help | FAQ | Report a Data Error | About
:
Login
Tip: To see papers related to the one you are viewing…

PEP-Web Tip of the Day

When there are articles or videos related to the one you are viewing, you will see a related papers icon next to the title, like this: RelatedPapers32Final3For example:

2015-11-06_09h28_31

Click on it and you will see a bibliographic list of papers that are related (including the current one).  Related papers may be papers which are commentaries, responses to commentaries, erratum, and videos discussing the paper.  Since they are not part of the original source material, they are added by PEP editorial staff, and may not be marked as such in every possible case.

 

For the complete list of tips, see PEP-Web Tips on the PEP-Web support page.

Bing, J.F. (1986). The Annual of Psychoanalysis. XI, 1983: Psychoanalysis and the Two Cerebral Hemispheres. F. M. Levin and D. M Vuckovich. Pp. 171-197.. Psychoanal Q., 55:363-364.
Psychoanalytic Electronic Publishing: The Annual of Psychoanalysis. XI, 1983: Psychoanalysis and the Two Cerebral Hemispheres. F. M. Levin and D. M Vuckovich. Pp. 171-197.

(1986). Psychoanalytic Quarterly, 55:363-364

The Annual of Psychoanalysis. XI, 1983: Psychoanalysis and the Two Cerebral Hemispheres. F. M. Levin and D. M Vuckovich. Pp. 171-197.

James F. Bing

The authors hint that anatomical changes may actually result from analysis and discuss the possibility of relating analytic concepts to anatomy and neurology. They suggest that one hemisphere may not know what is happening in the other, which may be related to disavowal and repression. Repression is the blocking of the past


WARNING! This text is printed for personal use. It is copyright to the journal in which it originally appeared. It is illegal to redistribute it in any form.
- 363 -

from one hemisphere to the other. The authors discuss the evolutional significance of bicamerality. Civilization and meaning can become possible only after a certain degree of development of the brain's bicameral structure. According to Lashley, "a complex organization held together by interaction of processes has no distinguishing feature other than its organization," and the authors state that this is what they have been trying to show in their own words. They believe that analyzability is definitely related to the plasticity of the brain; the analyst, they suggest, functions effectively by linking the two hemispheres. Perhaps the authors' most useful contribution is the attempt to correlate neurological and psychoanalytic data, which may enable us to further understand personality structure.


WARNING! This text is printed for personal use. It is copyright to the journal in which it originally appeared. It is illegal to redistribute it in any form.
- 364 -

Article Citation

Bing, J.F. (1986). The Annual of Psychoanalysis. XI, 1983. Psychoanal. Q., 55:363-364

Copyright © 2017, Psychoanalytic Electronic Publishing, ISSN 2472-6982 Customer Service | Help | FAQ | Download PEP Bibliography | Report a Data Error | About

WARNING! This text is printed for personal use. It is copyright to the journal in which it originally appeared. It is illegal to redistribute it in any form.