Customer Service | Help | FAQ | Report a Data Error | About
:
Login
Tip: To quickly go to the Table of Volumes from any article…

PEP-Web Tip of the Day

To quickly go to the Table of Volumes from any article, click on the banner for the journal at the top of the article.

For the complete list of tips, see PEP-Web Tips on the PEP-Web support page.

Storm, J.E. (1986). British Journal of Medical Psychology. LVII, 1984: Prediction vs. Reflection in Therapist Demonstration of Understanding. Ira D. Turkat and Victor S. Alpher. Pp. 235-240.. Psychoanal Q., 55:551.
Psychoanalytic Electronic Publishing: British Journal of Medical Psychology. LVII, 1984: Prediction vs. Reflection in Therapist Demonstration of Understanding. Ira D. Turkat and Victor S. Alpher. Pp. 235-240.

(1986). Psychoanalytic Quarterly, 55:551

British Journal of Medical Psychology. LVII, 1984: Prediction vs. Reflection in Therapist Demonstration of Understanding. Ira D. Turkat and Victor S. Alpher. Pp. 235-240.

James E. Storm

The authors examine the ways in which college students, in non-clinical experiments, judged different interactions by therapists as indicating the degree to which therapists understood their patients. Therapist interactions which predicted future patient behavior were judged to exhibit the greatest degree of understanding. Those which restated the patient's problems (reflective) or admitted not understanding the patient (naïve) were judged not to differ from each other in revealing the therapist's understanding. On the basis of this experiment, the authors question the usefulness of the latter two types of therapist interactions.

- 551 -

Article Citation

Storm, J.E. (1986). British Journal of Medical Psychology. LVII, 1984. Psychoanal. Q., 55:551

Copyright © 2018, Psychoanalytic Electronic Publishing, ISSN 2472-6982 Customer Service | Help | FAQ | Download PEP Bibliography | Report a Data Error | About

WARNING! This text is printed for personal use. It is copyright to the journal in which it originally appeared. It is illegal to redistribute it in any form.