Login
Good, M.I. (1986). Meeting of the Psychoanalytic Institute of New England, East. Psychoanal Q., 55:556-558.

Welcome to PEP Web!

Viewing the full text of this document requires a subscription to PEP Web.

If you are coming in from a university from a registered IP address or secure referral page you should not need to log in. Contact your university librarian in the event of problems.

If you have a personal subscription on your own account or through a Society or Institute please put your username and password in the box below. Any difficulties should be reported to your group administrator.

Username:
Password:

Can't remember your username and/or password? If you have forgotten your username and/or password please click here and log in to the PaDS database. Once there you need to fill in your email address (this must be the email address that PEP has on record for you) and click "Send." Your username and password will be sent to this email address within a few minutes. If this does not work for you please contact your group organizer.

Athens or federation user? Login here.

Not already a subscriber? Order a subscription today.

(1986). Psychoanalytic Quarterly, 55:556-558

Meeting of the Psychoanalytic Institute of New England, East

Michael I. Good

October 29, 1984. PANEL: RECONSTRUCTION REVISITED. Axel Hoffer, M.D., Moderator, Henry Smith, M.D., Ana-Maria Rizzuto, M.D., Robert Pyles, M.D., Evelyne Schwaber, M.D.

Dr. Henry Smith noted the many connotations of the word "reconstruction" in the literature. Illustrating his discussion with several case examples, he used the term in its most general sense to refer to a mutual undertaking of patient and analyst to reconstruct the history and experience of the patient. The primary emphasis of those who have written on reconstruction falls somewhere between the poles of objective past experience and the subjective perception of that experience. It is difficult to know in any situation "what actually happened." The existence of an illusory component of perceived reality and of remembered experience is neither a new idea nor one limited to the field of psychoanalysis. Theoretical physicists also make linking constructions to fill in the gaps in our conception of physical reality. Ernst Kris wrote that the further course of life seems to determine which childhood experiences gain significance as traumatic. An illustration for the interrelation of fantasy and reality is Arlow's model of a translucent screen with movie projectors on both sides, one projecting the conscious perceptions of external reality, the other simultaneously projecting images of unconscious fantasy. The composite of the two images represents subjective, or psychic, reality. For some patients, one

[This is a summary or excerpt from the full text of the book or article. The full text of the document is available to subscribers.]

Copyright © 2014, Psychoanalytic Electronic Publishing. Help | About | Download PEP Bibliography | Report a Problem

WARNING! This text is printed for the personal use of the subscriber to PEP Web and is copyright to the Journal in which it originally appeared. It is illegal to copy, distribute or circulate it in any form whatsoever.