Login
Kunstadt, L.P. (1986). Brain and Psyche. The Biology of the Unconscious: By Jonathan Winson. Garden City, N.Y.: Anchor Press/Doubleday, 1985. 300 pp.. Psychoanal Q., 55:689-690.

Welcome to PEP Web!

Viewing the full text of this document requires a subscription to PEP Web.

If you are coming in from a university from a registered IP address or secure referral page you should not need to log in. Contact your university librarian in the event of problems.

If you have a personal subscription on your own account or through a Society or Institute please put your username and password in the box below. Any difficulties should be reported to your group administrator.

Username:
Password:

Can't remember your username and/or password? If you have forgotten your username and/or password please click here and log in to the PaDS database. Once there you need to fill in your email address (this must be the email address that PEP has on record for you) and click "Send." Your username and password will be sent to this email address within a few minutes. If this does not work for you please contact your group organizer.

Athens or federation user? Login here.

Not already a subscriber? Order a subscription today.

(1986). Psychoanalytic Quarterly, 55:689-690

Brain and Psyche. The Biology of the Unconscious: By Jonathan Winson. Garden City, N.Y.: Anchor Press/Doubleday, 1985. 300 pp.

Lawrence P. Kunstadt Author Information

This is an interesting, well-written book containing some novel ideas on the relation between brain and mind, but despite the title, it is not for psychoanalysts. The book elaborates one hypothesis that does not justify an analyst's time spent reading the three hundred pages of text.

About forty percent of the book is devoted to a presentation of some aspects of undergraduate physiological psychology. Its main point is to introduce the notion that the spiny anteater, family echidna, does not exhibit REM sleep, unlike the dozen or so other mammals which have been studied, but that this animal does have a relatively large prefrontal cortex, larger for its body size than that of any other living mammal, including man.

Another forty-odd percent of the text contains a historical overview of psychoanalysis. There is nothing in this section that is not already familiar to the analytic reader. The final fifteen percent makes up the crux of the book. (Actually, the core of the argument is presented in the first two pages of this section.) "The Hypothesis" is that the prefrontal cortex in ancestral monotremes served "to integrate experience over time," a phenomenon better known as learning. These early monotremes were able to carry out this "integration of new with older experience" during their waking state (that is, they could learn while awake) because they have oversized prefrontal cortices and did not need to learn too much anyway. Later mammals, including humans, replaced the prefrontal cortex solution with the REM sleep solution. That is, the functions carried out by the prefrontal cortex in monotremes, to "assimilate new information, associate it with memories of past experiences and formulate a plan to govern new behavior during the waking state," are carried out instead by REM sleep in the majority of mammals, which do not have very large prefrontal cortices.

—————————————

1 The spiny anteater is a monotreme, a "primitive" mammal with many reptilian characteristics. The author uses it to represent the earliest mammals, from which humans evolved.

- 689 -

[This is a summary or excerpt from the full text of the book or article. The full text of the document is available to subscribers.]

Copyright © 2014, Psychoanalytic Electronic Publishing. Help | About | Download PEP Bibliography | Report a Problem

WARNING! This text is printed for the personal use of the subscriber to PEP Web and is copyright to the Journal in which it originally appeared. It is illegal to copy, distribute or circulate it in any form whatsoever.