Customer Service | Help | FAQ | Report a Data Error | About
Tip: To find a specific quote…

PEP-Web Tip of the Day

Trying to find a specific quote? Go to the Search section, and write it using quotation marks in “Search for Words or Phrases in Context.”

For the complete list of tips, see PEP-Web Tips on the PEP-Web support page.

Chaitman, E. (1986). Meeting of the Psychoanalytic Association of New York. Psychoanal Q., 55:705-707.

Welcome to PEP Web!

Viewing the full text of this document requires a subscription to PEP Web.

If you are coming in from a university from a registered IP address or secure referral page you should not need to log in. Contact your university librarian in the event of problems.

If you have a personal subscription on your own account or through a Society or Institute please put your username and password in the box below. Any difficulties should be reported to your group administrator.


Can't remember your username and/or password? If you have forgotten your username and/or password please click here and log in to the PaDS database. Once there you need to fill in your email address (this must be the email address that PEP has on record for you) and click "Send." Your username and password will be sent to this email address within a few minutes. If this does not work for you please contact your group organizer.

OpenAthens or federation user? Login here.

Not already a subscriber? Order a subscription today.

(1986). Psychoanalytic Quarterly, 55:705-707

Meeting of the Psychoanalytic Association of New York

Edmund Chaitman

DISCUSSION: Dr. Melvin Stanger disagreed with much that Dr. Isay said, but welcomed the provocative paper as a stimulus to clarify many concepts regarding homosexuality. First, he disagreed with Dr. Isay's concept of neutrality, which involves accepting homosexuality as a given. He felt it rested on false premises: that homosexual orientation cannot be changed through psychoanalysis; and that homosexuality may be adaptive if interfering conflicts are resolved. True neutrality, said Dr. Stanger, included a professional ethical wish to help a patient achieve all he was capable of, while remaining flexible enough to settle for limitations in goals if that proved necessary. It did not foreclose the possibility of change, as did Dr. Isay's view of neutrality. He also wondered if Dr. Isay's use of transference exploitation to effect sexual behavioral change did not in itself make sexual orientation change impossible. Dr. Stanger commented on the difficulties in treating the overt homosexual as opposed to the "defensive" homosexual. While acknowledging phallic oedipal determinants, he stressed the preoedipal origins of the homosexual's conflicts which make it difficult for him to tolerate his intense loneliness and anxiety. The

- 705 -

[This is a summary or excerpt from the full text of the book or article. The full text of the document is available to subscribers.]

Copyright © 2017, Psychoanalytic Electronic Publishing, ISSN 2472-6982 Customer Service | Help | FAQ | Download PEP Bibliography | Report a Data Error | About

WARNING! This text is printed for personal use. It is copyright to the journal in which it originally appeared. It is illegal to redistribute it in any form.