Customer Service | Help | FAQ | PEP-Easy | Report a Data Error | About
Tip: To quickly return to the issue’s Table of Contents from an article…

PEP-Web Tip of the Day

You can go back to to the issue’s Table of Contents in one click by clicking on the article title in the article view. What’s more, it will take you to the specific place in the TOC where the article appears.

For the complete list of tips, see PEP-Web Tips on the PEP-Web support page.

Easton, J. (1989). Meeting of the Psychoanalytic Association of New York. Psychoanal Q., 58:336-337.

(1989). Psychoanalytic Quarterly, 58:336-337

Meeting of the Psychoanalytic Association of New York

Jonathan Easton

DISCUSSION: Dr. Eugene Halpert raised the question of how the patients described by Dr. Silverman can be differentiated from other patients with the same psychic and behavioral constellations who do not have underlying phobic or claustrophobic dynamics. He provided a case example of an obsessive-compulsive man who took pride in his independence, was an entrepreneur, and was controlling and competitive. Wishes to nurtured and fed were also prominent. The behavior and underlying dynamics of this obsessive-compulsive character matched very well the profile given by Dr. Silverman of the claustrophobic character. Therefore, "the question of what is unique to the development of the phobic character as opposed to, for example, the obsessive-compulsive character is a complex one… Issues of ego and superego development in the various character types would have to be addressed." Another question is: Why don't the characters described by Dr. Silverman end up as overtly symptomatic claustrophobes? Dr. Halpert speculated that this has to do with the nature of their identifications, particularly those inherent in the formation of the ego ideal. In Dr. Silverman's case history, the patient's father had been very phobic, and the patient had recalled phobic attitudes of his own during childhood. But he had been so troubled by his father's "weaknesses" that he forced himself to overcome his own. Dr. Halpert suggested that this patient had "both identified with his father's phobia (which equaled weakness) and competed with him; he would be stronger … and less feminine than father by not being phobic." Being overtly phobic would be a "blow to aspects of his masculine ego ideal"; therefore, his own phobia had to be hidden. Dr. Halpert's obsessional patient had different sorts of identifications but a similar need to hide these identifications from himself. Dr. Halpert than indicated that he had other questions but had decided, in keeping with the topic, "to avoid them."

Dr. John Munder Ross reviewed some of the earlier contributions to this topic, including Lewin's, with its emphasis on the body-phallus equation, the wish to be "inside the mother's body-womb and the fear of encountering therein the avenging paternal phallus." In reviewing these earlier understandings of claustrophobic symptoms, Dr. Ross sought to reconstruct the bridges made by Dr.

[This is a summary or excerpt from the full text of the book or article. The full text of the document is available to subscribers.]

Copyright © 2021, Psychoanalytic Electronic Publishing, ISSN 2472-6982 Customer Service | Help | FAQ | Download PEP Bibliography | Report a Data Error | About

WARNING! This text is printed for personal use. It is copyright to the journal in which it originally appeared. It is illegal to redistribute it in any form.