Customer Service | Help | FAQ | Report a Data Error | About
Tip: To see Abram’s analysis of Winnicott’s theories…

PEP-Web Tip of the Day

In-depth analysis of Winnicott’s psychoanalytic theorization was conducted by Jan Abrams in her work The Language of Winnicott. You can access it directly by clicking here.

For the complete list of tips, see PEP-Web Tips on the PEP-Web support page.

Raymond, L.W. (1991). Meeting of the Psychoanalytic Institute of New England, East. Psychoanal Q., 60:182.

Welcome to PEP Web!

Viewing the full text of this document requires a subscription to PEP Web.

If you are coming in from a university from a registered IP address or secure referral page you should not need to log in. Contact your university librarian in the event of problems.

If you have a personal subscription on your own account or through a Society or Institute please put your username and password in the box below. Any difficulties should be reported to your group administrator.


Can't remember your username and/or password? If you have forgotten your username and/or password please click here and log in to the PaDS database. Once there you need to fill in your email address (this must be the email address that PEP has on record for you) and click "Send." Your username and password will be sent to this email address within a few minutes. If this does not work for you please contact your group organizer.

OpenAthens or federation user? Login here.

Not already a subscriber? Order a subscription today.

(1991). Psychoanalytic Quarterly, 60:182

Meeting of the Psychoanalytic Institute of New England, East

Laurie W. Raymond

DISCUSSION: Dr. Gerald Stechler supported Dr. Pine's attempt to integrate several different psychoanalytic schools of thought in a manner useful to clinicians. He suggested that we should sharpen our views of motivation and of aggression. He pointed out that we not only need to clarify whether there is an inner motive for mastery or whether mastery and assertion are derivatives of pro-active and reactive aggression, but that we also need to explain the range of individual differences in the manifestations of these phenomena. He proposed his own model which states that narcissistic injury (the stifling of assertive aims) creates a contamination between assertion and aggression, and that aggression becomes pro-active by taking on properties of assertion. Reactive aggression therefore becomes pro-active through injury. The more one has been injured, the more likely it is that one will exhibit pro-active aggression. Dr. Stechler noted the potential harm of a theoretical position that teaches patients, "through the analyst's eyes," that each time they reach out and try to make an assertion in the transference or in life, such behavior is a derivative of aggression and not free-standing.

Dr. Ana-Maria Rizzuto asked how the unconscious is formulated in Dr. Pine's model. He answered that all the phenomena described and the ideational systems connected to them may exist in consciousness or unconsciousness. He did not feel it was necessary to address that question now, because

[This is a summary or excerpt from the full text of the book or article. The full text of the document is available to subscribers.]

Copyright © 2017, Psychoanalytic Electronic Publishing, ISSN 2472-6982 Customer Service | Help | FAQ | Download PEP Bibliography | Report a Data Error | About

WARNING! This text is printed for personal use. It is copyright to the journal in which it originally appeared. It is illegal to redistribute it in any form.