Login
Lansky, M.R. (1992). Foundations of Object Relations Family Therapy: Edited by Jill Savege Scharff, M.D. Northvale, NJ/London: Jason Aronson, Inc., 1989. 488 pp.. Psychoanal Q., 61:282-286.

Welcome to PEP Web!

Viewing the full text of this document requires a subscription to PEP Web.

If you are coming in from a university from a registered IP address or secure referral page you should not need to log in. Contact your university librarian in the event of problems.

If you have a personal subscription on your own account or through a Society or Institute please put your username and password in the box below. Any difficulties should be reported to your group administrator.

Username:
Password:

Can't remember your username and/or password? If you have forgotten your username and/or password please click here and log in to the PaDS database. Once there you need to fill in your email address (this must be the email address that PEP has on record for you) and click "Send." Your username and password will be sent to this email address within a few minutes. If this does not work for you please contact your group organizer.

Athens or federation user? Login here.

Not already a subscriber? Order a subscription today.

(1992). Psychoanalytic Quarterly, 61:282-286

Foundations of Object Relations Family Therapy: Edited by Jill Savege Scharff, M.D. Northvale, NJ/London: Jason Aronson, Inc., 1989. 488 pp.

Melvin R. Lansky Author Information

Family therapy emerged in the early 1950's, in the heyday of postwar ego psychology, as an attempt, largely by psychoanalysts, to study psychiatric disorders, schizophrenia in particular, which were viewed as adaptations to a disturbed family environment. Of the early pioneers in family therapy, Don Jackson in Palo Alto, Theodore Lidz and Stephen Fleck in New Haven, and Murray Bowen and Lyman Wynne in Washington D.C. were psychoanalysts. The early researchers probably began the family therapy movement in reaction to seeing the malignant effects of identifying only one person in a dysfunctional system as pathological. The movement over time became increasingly hostile to medical models, to professionalism in general, and to individual psychotherapeutic orientations, especially psychoanalysis.

The remarkable and persistent mutual mistrust between psychoanalysis and family therapy that has existed over the last forty years has begun to thaw, however slightly. Even models of infant observation and development have recently gone from a one-party to a familial frame of reference. A case in point is the current emphasis on "attunement" and on the quality of maternal and paternal relationships with infants, rather than on the child-centered Mahlerian model of stages of separation-individuation prevalent a few years ago.

- 282 -

[This is a summary or excerpt from the full text of the book or article. The full text of the document is available to subscribers.]

Copyright © 2014, Psychoanalytic Electronic Publishing. Help | About | Download PEP Bibliography | Report a Problem

WARNING! This text is printed for the personal use of the subscriber to PEP Web and is copyright to the Journal in which it originally appeared. It is illegal to copy, distribute or circulate it in any form whatsoever.