Customer Service | Help | FAQ | PEP-Easy | Report a Data Error | About
Tip: To download the bibliographic list of all PEP-Web content…

PEP-Web Tip of the Day

Did you know that you can download a bibliography of all content available on PEP Web to import to Endnote, Refer, or other bibliography manager? Just click on the link found at the bottom of the webpage. You can import into any UTF-8 (Unicode) compatible software which can import data in “Refer” format. You can get a free trial of one such program, Endnote, by clicking here.

For the complete list of tips, see PEP-Web Tips on the PEP-Web support page.

Gedo, J.E. (1992). Drive, Ego, Object, and Self. A Synthesis for Clinical Work: By Fred Pine. New York: Basic Books, Inc., 1990. 279 pp.. Psychoanal Q., 61:286-291.

(1992). Psychoanalytic Quarterly, 61:286-291

Drive, Ego, Object, and Self. A Synthesis for Clinical Work: By Fred Pine. New York: Basic Books, Inc., 1990. 279 pp.

Review by:
John E. Gedo

It is a pleasure, albeit somewhat mixed, to welcome Fred Pine into the thin ranks of psychoanalytic ecumenicists—the stubborn few who refuse to join one of the competing schools that vie for our allegiance in this era of glasnost. Undaunted by the prevalent demands for theoretical and technical simplicity, Pine insists that unprejudiced attention to clinical material demonstrates that the four clusters of issues alluded to in the title of his book may have independent roles in pathogenesis, though in varying proportions in different instances. He rightly implies that excessive emphasis on one of these clusters (or perhaps a combination of two of them) characterizes the approach of many of the ideological factions within psychoanalysis. The latter may therefore be condemned as reductionistic, although Pine grants their proponents some credit for highlighting one or another of what he regards as the alternative "psychologies" at our disposal.

The argument for an ecumenical position stands or falls on the persuasiveness of its proponents' clinical accounts—at least, this will continue to be the case as long as unbiased follow-up studies of analyses conducted in accord with different premises remain unavailable. Pine is clearly aware that his narratives of clinical work form the core of his book; in addition to two cases culled from the literature, he provides a dozen fresh clinical illustrations, ranging from relatively brief vignettes to a couple of fuller accounts from completed analyses. Depending on the particular purpose of the illustrative material, it might be focused on reasonably detailed extracts from specific sessions (even some verbatim accounts), or it might organize narratives of analytic process in terms of the meaning of the data encoded in the construct language Pine favors.

[This is a summary or excerpt from the full text of the book or article. The full text of the document is available to subscribers.]

Copyright © 2020, Psychoanalytic Electronic Publishing, ISSN 2472-6982 Customer Service | Help | FAQ | Download PEP Bibliography | Report a Data Error | About

WARNING! This text is printed for personal use. It is copyright to the journal in which it originally appeared. It is illegal to redistribute it in any form.