Customer Service | Help | FAQ | Report a Data Error | About
Tip: To see the German word that Freud used to refer to a concept…

PEP-Web Tip of the Day

Want to know the exact German word that Freud used to refer to a psychoanalytic concept? Move your mouse over a paragraph while reading The Standard Edition of the Complete Psychological Works of Sigmund Freud and a window will emerge displaying the text in its original German version.

For the complete list of tips, see PEP-Web Tips on the PEP-Web support page.

Kaplan, D.M. (1992). Handbook of Phobia Therapy. Rapid Symptom Relief in Anxiety Disorders: Edited by Carol Lindemann, Ph.D. Northvale, NJ/London: Jason Aronson, Inc., 1989. 434 pp.. Psychoanal Q., 61:295-298.

Welcome to PEP Web!

Viewing the full text of this document requires a subscription to PEP Web.

If you are coming in from a university from a registered IP address or secure referral page you should not need to log in. Contact your university librarian in the event of problems.

If you have a personal subscription on your own account or through a Society or Institute please put your username and password in the box below. Any difficulties should be reported to your group administrator.


Can't remember your username and/or password? If you have forgotten your username and/or password please click here and log in to the PaDS database. Once there you need to fill in your email address (this must be the email address that PEP has on record for you) and click "Send." Your username and password will be sent to this email address within a few minutes. If this does not work for you please contact your group organizer.

OpenAthens or federation user? Login here.

Not already a subscriber? Order a subscription today.

(1992). Psychoanalytic Quarterly, 61:295-298

Handbook of Phobia Therapy. Rapid Symptom Relief in Anxiety Disorders: Edited by Carol Lindemann, Ph.D. Northvale, NJ/London: Jason Aronson, Inc., 1989. 434 pp.

Review by:
Donald M. Kaplan

Psychoanalysis has always been beset by charges of insulation and parochialism. What such admonitions usually mean is that psychoanalysts do not familiarize themselves sufficiently with the fine print of kindred fields, such as psychiatry, psychology, philosophy, neurophysiology, and anthropology, for if they did, they would surely mend their theories and change their practices. On the other hand, our critics are themselves likely to be only approximately familiar with the technicalities of psychoanalysis, so that their recommendations are often addressed to merely fictive psychoanalytic theories and practices. Such is part of the normal exchange that goes on across boundaries of disciplines that hold certain interests in common. However distracting and digressive this state of affairs might be, it is not altogether unproductive, because it moves many practitioners on both sides of a boundary to get better acquainted with another's point of view on a shared interest, thereby enabling a realization yet again of all the subtleties that are entailed in one's first principles and the practices they constitute.

Particularly sensitive and often intimidating exchanges for the psychoanalyst go on at the boundaries of clinical research, because, among other things, psychoanalysis is importantly a clinical practice, and therefore diagnosis and prognosis have always been especially urgent matters for the psychoanalyst. Indeed, the nature of analyzability, its limits and forms with respect to differential diagnosis, e.g., anxiety as distinguished from panic disorder or neurotic

- 295 -

[This is a summary or excerpt from the full text of the book or article. The full text of the document is available to subscribers.]

Copyright © 2017, Psychoanalytic Electronic Publishing, ISSN 2472-6982 Customer Service | Help | FAQ | Download PEP Bibliography | Report a Data Error | About

WARNING! This text is printed for personal use. It is copyright to the journal in which it originally appeared. It is illegal to redistribute it in any form.