Login
Spruiell, G. (1992). Meetings of the Psychoanalytic Institute of New England, East. Psychoanal Q., 61:328-330.

Welcome to PEP Web!

Viewing the full text of this document requires a subscription to PEP Web.

If you are coming in from a university from a registered IP address or secure referral page you should not need to log in. Contact your university librarian in the event of problems.

If you have a personal subscription on your own account or through a Society or Institute please put your username and password in the box below. Any difficulties should be reported to your group administrator.

Username:
Password:

Can't remember your username and/or password? If you have forgotten your username and/or password please click here and log in to the PaDS database. Once there you need to fill in your email address (this must be the email address that PEP has on record for you) and click "Send." Your username and password will be sent to this email address within a few minutes. If this does not work for you please contact your group organizer.

Athens or federation user? Login here.

Not already a subscriber? Order a subscription today.

(1992). Psychoanalytic Quarterly, 61:328-330

Meetings of the Psychoanalytic Institute of New England, East

Graham Spruiell

DISCUSSION: Dr. Jacob A. Arlow pointed out that there is much confusion and controversy about the term "countertransference." Defining it becomes useful for the discussion. Countertransference is first a derivative concept of transference, which means literally, from its Latin roots, "to carry over." An instinctual wish for a scenario involving a primary object is "carried over" in experience, not as an abstraction. Dr. Arlow asked, "From whom to whom?" The answer determines the term for consideration. Recently, some have considered any thought or feeling occurring in the analysis to be a manifestation of transference. Dr. Arlow sees such conceptions as simplistic, because many communications exist outside the sphere of transference. Yet elements of transference, in both directions, are present in all relationships. In psychoanalysis the setting and the relationship are unique. Analysts neither endorse nor reject what is projected upon them by the patient; hence "transference manifestations stand out in bolder relief." It therefore becomes easier in analysis to demonstrate unreal (carried over) aspects of feelings and wishes toward the analyst,

- 328 -

[This is a summary or excerpt from the full text of the book or article. The full text of the document is available to subscribers.]

Copyright © 2014, Psychoanalytic Electronic Publishing. Help | About | Download PEP Bibliography | Report a Problem

WARNING! This text is printed for the personal use of the subscriber to PEP Web and is copyright to the Journal in which it originally appeared. It is illegal to copy, distribute or circulate it in any form whatsoever.