|Gann, E. (1992). Panic. The Course of a Psychoanalysis: By Thorkil Vanggaard. New York/London: W. W. Norton & Co., Inc., 1989. 144 pp.. Psychoanal Q., 61:495-497.|
Viewing the full text of this document requires a subscription to PEP Web.
If you are coming in from a university from a registered IP address or secure referral page you should not need to log in. Contact your university librarian in the event of problems.
If you have a personal subscription on your own account or through a Society or Institute please put your username and password in the box below. Any difficulties should be reported to your group administrator.
(1992). Psychoanalytic Quarterly, 61:495-497
Panic. The Course of a Psychoanalysis: By Thorkil Vanggaard. New York/London: W. W. Norton & Co., Inc., 1989. 144 pp.
Thorkil Vanggaard is not likely to be a name familiar to most American psychoanalysts, even though he is a foremost senior psychiatrist in Copenhagen; he spent part of his long career in this country while doing psychoanalytic at the New York Psychoanalytic Institute. In this slim volume, he presents the clinical record of an old case and proffers an argument for the psychotherapeutic approach to a clinical entity which is now regarded in this country in general psychiatric circles as an almost purely biological phenomenon, the treatment of which requires primarily pharmacological —so-called "panic disorder."
It is not clear whether Vanggaard intended this report more for a psychoanalytic or for a psychiatric audience. The former group will likely find this effort to be an enjoyable, though not profound, clinical account, which raises indirectly some fascinating questions, albeit without really tackling the theoretical issues involved. They are not trivial matters at all; for instance, Vanggaard's that this five-and-a-half-month, three-times-a-week treatment should be regarded as an "analysis." (Most analytic readers will probably conclude that this case represents a very successful psychoanalytically oriented , and a at that.) However, the most enduring value of this case report, one which may, in fact, make it one of the most important psychoanalytic publications in recent years, concerns issues of and treatment which Vanggaard addresses to psychiatrists as a whole in a direct, accessible, and convincing manner. Of particular relevance to American psychiatry is the implicit critique of DSM-III and DSM-III-R regarding the politically determined expunging of the term and concept of "" from the official nosological lexicon.
Even this evaluation of the book does not diminish its potential interest for the psychoanalytic clinician. In spite of the recent trend toward more complete reporting and publishing of clinical process, it is all too rare that we have the opportunity to access to the relatively unexpurgated, daily of a treatment from beginning to end. Add to that the even rarer inclusion of a seventeen-year follow-up on a case, with statements by both patient and therapist,
- 495 -
[This is a summary or excerpt from the full text of the book or article. The full text of the document is available to subscribers.]