Login
(1992). Meetings of the Psychoanalytic Institute and Society of New England, East. Psychoanal Q., 61:690-690.

Welcome to PEP Web!

Viewing the full text of this document requires a subscription to PEP Web.

If you are coming in from a university from a registered IP address or secure referral page you should not need to log in. Contact your university librarian in the event of problems.

If you have a personal subscription on your own account or through a Society or Institute please put your username and password in the box below. Any difficulties should be reported to your group administrator.

Username:
Password:

Can't remember your username and/or password? If you have forgotten your username and/or password please click here and log in to the PaDS database. Once there you need to fill in your email address (this must be the email address that PEP has on record for you) and click "Send." Your username and password will be sent to this email address within a few minutes. If this does not work for you please contact your group organizer.

Athens or federation user? Login here.

Not already a subscriber? Order a subscription today.

(1992). Psychoanalytic Quarterly, 61:690-690

Meetings of the Psychoanalytic Institute and Society of New England, East

September 30, 1991. IN SEARCH OF PSYCHOANALYTIC TECHNIQUE? PERSPECTIVES FROM ON THE COUCH AND FROM BEHIND THE COUCH. Bennett Simon, M.D.

In order to approach the elusive question of psychoanalytic technique as it is actually used, Dr. Simon proposed exploiting an "experiment of nature" derived from his own experience of technique as an analysand with four different analysts over eleven years. His method was to compare the four analytic settings and the analysts' manner of operating with respect to analytic atmosphere, free association, interpretation, the use of dreams, the reconstruction of childhood, parameters, personal revelations of the analyst, and the role of politics. Before presenting the data, Dr. Simon discussed difficulties in his methodology, including the self-serving nature of memory and privacy.

The first two analyses were with candidates (Drs. A and B), and the second two were with training analysts (Drs. C and D). The analyses with Drs. A and C were prematurely interrupted for extrinsic reasons. With regard to analytic atmosphere and free association, Dr. Simon found few differences attributable to theoretical disputes, but substantial differences related to temperament, personal style, and experience. The training analysts spoke much more. Dr. Simon reviewed current controversies about the relative importance of interpretation in the therapeutic action of analysis. He compared the frequency of complete interpretations in the four analyses, offering

[This is a summary or excerpt from the full text of the book or article. The full text of the document is available to subscribers.]

Copyright © 2014, Psychoanalytic Electronic Publishing. Help | About | Download PEP Bibliography | Report a Problem

WARNING! This text is printed for the personal use of the subscriber to PEP Web and is copyright to the Journal in which it originally appeared. It is illegal to copy, distribute or circulate it in any form whatsoever.