Customer Service | Help | FAQ | Report a Data Error | About
:
Login
Tip: To download the bibliographic list of all PEP-Web content…

PEP-Web Tip of the Day

Did you know that you can download a bibliography of all content available on PEP Web to import to Endnote, Refer, or other bibliography manager?  Just click on the link found at the bottom of the webpage. You can import into any UTF-8 (Unicode) compatible software which can import data in “Refer” format.  You can get a free trial of one such program, Endnote, by clicking here.

For the complete list of tips, see PEP-Web Tips on the PEP-Web support page.

Busch, F. (1995). Neglected Classics: M. N. Searl's “Some Queries On Principles Of Technique”. Psychoanal Q., 64:326-344.

(1995). Psychoanalytic Quarterly, 64:326-344

Neglected Classics: M. N. Searl's “Some Queries On Principles Of Technique”

Fred Busch, Ph.D.

In 1936 M. N. Searl published a brilliant exposition on the significance of resistance analysis. It was as well a singular exploration of some technical variables to be considered when the role of the ego is contemplated as part of our interpretive methods. I would consider it one of the preeminent examples in our literature of an ego psychological approach to the psychoanalytic process. Searl grasped the clinical implications of Freud's (1923, 1926) introduction of the structural theory and of his second theory of anxiety as few authors before or since have done.

If my reading of the significance of Searl's article is correct, it is deserving of further study because it is a remarkable historical document that presages the work of such psychoanalytic scholars as Kris, Gray, and Schafer writing in this same area some forty to fifty years later (Gray, 1973, 1982, 1986, 1990, 1992; Kris, 1982, 1983, 1990, 1992; Schafer, 1983). However, Searl's article also stands out as an exceptional rendering of the psychoanalytic process, with the ego at the center of the analytic work. Like few papers in our field, it gives the clinician a feeling for an ego psychological approach to the data of psychoanalysis that is an alive, dynamic method of working in the clinical situation. Yet I have seen Searl's paper referred to only in two works, widely separated in time but not in tone (see, Fenichel, 1941; Gray, 1982).

[This is a summary or excerpt from the full text of the book or article. The full text of the document is available to subscribers.]

Copyright © 2018, Psychoanalytic Electronic Publishing, ISSN 2472-6982 Customer Service | Help | FAQ | Download PEP Bibliography | Report a Data Error | About

WARNING! This text is printed for personal use. It is copyright to the journal in which it originally appeared. It is illegal to redistribute it in any form.