Customer Service | Help | FAQ | PEP-Easy | Report a Data Error | About
:
Login
Tip: To quickly return to the issue’s Table of Contents from an article…

PEP-Web Tip of the Day

You can go back to to the issue’s Table of Contents in one click by clicking on the article title in the article view. What’s more, it will take you to the specific place in the TOC where the article appears.

For the complete list of tips, see PEP-Web Tips on the PEP-Web support page.

Acklin, T. (1998). The Question of Jung and Racism Reconsidered. Laurie M. Johnson Bagby. Pp. 283-298. Psychoanal Q., 67(1):190.
Psychoanalytic Electronic Publishing: The Question of Jung and Racism Reconsidered. Laurie M. Johnson Bagby. Pp. 283-298

(1998). Psychoanalytic Quarterly, 67(1):190

The Question of Jung and Racism Reconsidered. Laurie M. Johnson Bagby. Pp. 283-298

Thomas Acklin

Taking into account critics' charges of racism in the writings of Jung, the author feels that Jung's naïveté and unconscious stereotyping of blacks did indeed creep into his scholarly works. Nonetheless, Jung was also able to be critical of European culture and indeed found the European psyche to be rather seriously imbalanced in a way which has made “analytic psychology” necessary. The balance must be restored so that the individual realizes the power of the unconscious and establishes a healthy relationship to it. Jung felt that a dialectic between Western and non-Western cultures was critical for this. The shadow perception which could be connected with all objects of racism and other prejudice is in fact, for Jung, the realm of most intensive exploration and understanding.

- 190 -

Article Citation

Acklin, T. (1998). The Question of Jung and Racism Reconsidered. Laurie M. Johnson Bagby.. Psychoanal. Q., 67(1):190

Copyright © 2020, Psychoanalytic Electronic Publishing, ISSN 2472-6982 Customer Service | Help | FAQ | Download PEP Bibliography | Report a Data Error | About

WARNING! This text is printed for personal use. It is copyright to the journal in which it originally appeared. It is illegal to redistribute it in any form.