Customer Service | Help | FAQ | Report a Data Error | About
:
Login
Tip: To sort articles by Rank…

PEP-Web Tip of the Day

You can specify Rank as the sort order when searching (it’s the default) which will put the articles which best matched your search on the top, and the complete results in descending relevance to your search.    This feature is useful for finding the most important articles on a specific topic.

You can also change the sort order of results by selecting rank at the top of the search results pane after you perform a search.  Note that rank order after a search only ranks up to 1000 maximum results that were returned; specifying rank in the search dialog ranks all possibilities before choosing the final 1000 (or less) to return.

For the complete list of tips, see PEP-Web Tips on the PEP-Web support page.

Layton, L. (1998). In Defense of Gender Ambiguity: Jessica Benjamin. Gender & Psychoanalysis. I, 1996. Pp. 27-43. Psychoanal Q., 67(2):341.
Psychoanalytic Electronic Publishing: In Defense of Gender Ambiguity: Jessica Benjamin. Gender & Psychoanalysis. I, 1996. Pp. 27-43

(1998). Psychoanalytic Quarterly, 67(2):341

In Defense of Gender Ambiguity: Jessica Benjamin. Gender & Psychoanalysis. I, 1996. Pp. 27-43

Lynne Layton

Benjamin adds an important new thread to her argument that bigender and bisexual positions are products of healthy development. Unlike many postmodern theorists who cast off developmental theory because they find it essentially conservative, Benjamin continues to explore development for its potential to produce what she calls postconventional subjects. The author builds on her theory of identificatory love and on Irene Fast's theory of preoedipal gender overinclusiveness (which, according to Benjamin remains a part of the psyche). She argues that, while oedipal gender relations split masculinity and femininity, and split loving another and identifying with another, these polarities can be deconstructed by other developmental gender categories, such as identificatory love (a homoerotic love of one who is like; the wish to be loved as like). In the preoedipal period, identificatory love and object love, being and having, may not be so different. These earlier gender possibilities that remain in tension with oedipal polarities can be reintegrated in postoedipal phases, and here lies the hope for postconventional subjectivity.


WARNING! This text is printed for personal use. It is copyright to the journal in which it originally appeared. It is illegal to redistribute it in any form.
- 341 -

Article Citation

Layton, L. (1998). In Defense of Gender Ambiguity. Psychoanal. Q., 67(2):341

Copyright © 2017, Psychoanalytic Electronic Publishing, ISSN 2472-6982 Customer Service | Help | FAQ | Download PEP Bibliography | Report a Data Error | About

WARNING! This text is printed for personal use. It is copyright to the journal in which it originally appeared. It is illegal to redistribute it in any form.