Customer Service | Help | FAQ | PEP-Easy | Report a Data Error | About
:
Login
Tip: To sort articles by Rankā€¦

PEP-Web Tip of the Day

You can specify Rank as the sort order when searching (it’s the default) which will put the articles which best matched your search on the top, and the complete results in descending relevance to your search. This feature is useful for finding the most important articles on a specific topic.

You can also change the sort order of results by selecting rank at the top of the search results pane after you perform a search. Note that rank order after a search only ranks up to 1000 maximum results that were returned; specifying rank in the search dialog ranks all possibilities before choosing the final 1000 (or less) to return.

For the complete list of tips, see PEP-Web Tips on the PEP-Web support page.

Cavell, M. (1998). On a Contribution to a Future Scientific Study of Dream Interpretation. R. Sand. Pp. 527-547. Psychoanal Q., 67(3):530-531.
Psychoanalytic Electronic Publishing: On a Contribution to a Future Scientific Study of Dream Interpretation. R. Sand. Pp. 527-547

(1998). Psychoanalytic Quarterly, 67(3):530-531

On a Contribution to a Future Scientific Study of Dream Interpretation. R. Sand. Pp. 527-547

Marcia Cavell

Sand distinguishes Freud's theory of dream interpretation from a much older, traditional theory, traceable as far back as the Greek philosopher Zeno (4th century b.c.). Freud's theory focuses on the latent dream content; it claims that dreams are caused by repressed wishes, and that the form which a dream takes is

- 530 -

the result of censorship together with certain laws of primitive mental functioning. These Freudian claims are at odds with contemporary work in neurophysiology and dream research. In contrast, the traditional theory focuses on the manifest content and makes no causal claims; it uses the manifest content to illumine themes and problems on the dreamer's mind. The traditional rather than the Freudian theory, Sand suggests, points in the direction of future research, and is in any case the theory to which, overwhelmingly, clinical practice conforms.

It strikes me that the difference between a classic Freudian approach to dream interpretation and the approach Sand suggests is part of a much more pervasive difference between traditional psychoanalytic theory in general and ongoing clinical practice. The terrain on which psychoanalytic theory-building should take place may lie in taking systematic notice of this gap.

- 531 -

Article Citation

Cavell, M. (1998). On a Contribution to a Future Scientific Study of Dream Interpretation. R. Sand.. Psychoanal. Q., 67(3):530-531

Copyright © 2021, Psychoanalytic Electronic Publishing, ISSN 2472-6982 Customer Service | Help | FAQ | Download PEP Bibliography | Report a Data Error | About

WARNING! This text is printed for personal use. It is copyright to the journal in which it originally appeared. It is illegal to redistribute it in any form.