Tip: To see papers related to the one you are viewing…
PEP-Web Tip of the Day
When there are articles or videos related to the one you are viewing, you will see a related papers icon next to the title, like this: For example:
Click on it and you will see a bibliographic list of papers that are related (including the current one). Related papers may be papers which are commentaries, responses to commentaries, erratum, and videos discussing the paper. Since they are not part of the original source material, they are added by PEP editorial staff, and may not be marked as such in every possible case.
For the complete list of tips, see PEP-Web Tips on the PEP-Web support page.
(2007). Volume XIV, Number 2, 2006.: Towards Clarity in the Concept of Projective Identification: A Review and a Proposal (Part 2): Clinical Examples of Definitional Confusion. Ely Garfinkle, pp. 159-173.. Psychoanal Q., 76:1407-1408.
Welcome to PEP Web!
Viewing the full text of this document requires a subscription to PEP Web.
If you are coming in from a university from a registered IP address or secure referral page you should not need to log in. Contact your university librarian in the event of problems.
If you have a personal subscription on your own account or through a Society or Institute please put your username and password in the box below. Any difficulties should be reported to your group administrator.
Psychoanalytic Electronic Publishing: Volume XIV, Number 2, 2006.: Towards Clarity in the Concept of Projective Identification: A Review and a Proposal (Part 2): Clinical Examples of Definitional Confusion. Ely Garfinkle, pp. 159-173.
This is the second of a two-part article on projective identification, which the author defines as “an unconscious phantasy in which split-off parts of the self are disowned, projected, and attributed to someone else,” with the unconscious intent to “control and/or influence the thinking, feeling, and/or action of the object” (p. 159). The author purposefully excludes any interpersonal or countertransferential aspects from this definition, reasoning that whether and how much the object experiences the pressure of the projection in part depends on the object. This view privileges the unconscious intent of the projector, which the analyst can discern “based on clinical evidence” (p. 159).
In the first part of this article, which appeared in Volume XIII, Number 2 (2005), the author provided a detailed history of the use of the term projective identification and a persuasive argument for the author's definition of the term. Here in the second part of the article, the author uses two clinical vignettes to show how the
WARNING! This text is printed for personal use. It is copyright to the journal in which it originally appeared. It is illegal to redistribute it in any form. - 1407 -
above definition differs from others currently in use and how this definition could help avoid the current “Tower of Babel” (p. 171) regarding the use of the term.
WARNING! This text is printed for personal use. It is copyright to the journal in which it originally appeared. It is illegal to redistribute it in any form. - 1408 -
(2007). Volume XIV, Number 2, 2006.. Psychoanal. Q., 76:1407-1408