Login
(2007). Volume XIV, Number 2, 2006.: Towards Clarity in the Concept of Projective Identification: A Review and a Proposal (Part 2): Clinical Examples of Definitional Confusion. Ely Garfinkle, pp. 159-173.. Psychoanal Q., 76:1407-1408.

Welcome to PEP Web!

Viewing the full text of this document requires a subscription to PEP Web.

If you are coming in from a university from a registered IP address or secure referral page you should not need to log in. Contact your university librarian in the event of problems.

If you have a personal subscription on your own account or through a Society or Institute please put your username and password in the box below. Any difficulties should be reported to your group administrator.

Username:
Password:

Can't remember your username and/or password? If you have forgotten your username and/or password please click here and log in to the PaDS database. Once there you need to fill in your email address (this must be the email address that PEP has on record for you) and click "Send." Your username and password will be sent to this email address within a few minutes. If this does not work for you please contact your group organizer.

Athens or federation user? Login here.

Not already a subscriber? Order a subscription today.

Psychoanalytic Electronic Publishing: Volume XIV, Number 2, 2006.: Towards Clarity in the Concept of Projective Identification: A Review and a Proposal (Part 2): Clinical Examples of Definitional Confusion. Ely Garfinkle, pp. 159-173.

(2007). Psychoanalytic Quarterly, 76:1407-1408

Volume XIV, Number 2, 2006.: Towards Clarity in the Concept of Projective Identification: A Review and a Proposal (Part 2): Clinical Examples of Definitional Confusion. Ely Garfinkle, pp. 159-173.

This is the second of a two-part article on projective identification, which the author defines as “an unconscious phantasy in which split-off parts of the self are disowned, projected, and attributed to someone else,” with the unconscious intent to “control and/or influence the thinking, feeling, and/or action of the object” (p. 159). The author purposefully excludes any interpersonal or countertransferential aspects from this definition, reasoning that whether and how much the object experiences the pressure of the projection in part depends on the object. This view privileges the unconscious intent of the projector, which the analyst can discern “based on clinical evidence” (p. 159).

In the first part of this article, which appeared in Volume XIII, Number 2 (2005), the author provided a detailed history of the use of the term projective identification and a persuasive argument for the author's definition of the term. Here in the second part of the article, the author uses two clinical vignettes to show how the


WARNING! This text is printed for the personal use of the PEPWeb subscriber and is copyright to the Journal in which it originally appeared. It is illegal to copy, distribute or circulate it in any form.
- 1407 -

above definition differs from others currently in use and how this definition could help avoid the current “Tower of Babel” (p. 171) regarding the use of the term.


WARNING! This text is printed for the personal use of the PEPWeb subscriber and is copyright to the Journal in which it originally appeared. It is illegal to copy, distribute or circulate it in any form.
- 1408 -

Article Citation

(2007). Volume XIV, Number 2, 2006.. Psychoanal. Q., 76:1407-1408

Copyright © 2014, Psychoanalytic Electronic Publishing. Help | About | Download PEP Bibliography | Report a Problem

WARNING! This text is printed for the personal use of the subscriber to PEP Web and is copyright to the Journal in which it originally appeared. It is illegal to copy, distribute or circulate it in any form whatsoever.