Customer Service | Help | FAQ | PEP-Easy | Report a Data Error | About
:
Login
Tip: To use the Information icon…

PEP-Web Tip of the Day

The Information icon (an i in a circle) will give you valuable information about PEP Web data and features. You can find it besides a PEP Web feature and the author’s name in every journal article. Simply move the mouse pointer over the icon and click on it for the information to appear.

For the complete list of tips, see PEP-Web Tips on the PEP-Web support page.

Mishier, E.G. (1973). Man, Morality, and Madness: Critical Perspectives on the Work of R. D. Laing. Psychoanal. Contemp. Sci., 2(1):369-393.

(1973). Psychoanalysis and Contemporary Science, 2(1):369-393

8 Criticism of Theory

Man, Morality, and Madness: Critical Perspectives on the Work of R. D. Laing

Elliot G. Mishier, Ph.D.

This essay is a record of ambivalence only partially resolved. My differences with Laing are too deep to dismiss or gloss over, and yet I regret that this is so. Laing began as a psychiatrist and psychoanalyst, but he has come to address himself to much broader issues than are encompassed within the traditional boundaries of those disciplines. There are precedents, of course. Many of the great figures of twentieth-century psychiatry—Freud, Jung, Reich, Sullivan, among others—have tried to extrapolate their understandings gained in clinical work to the human condition, the great problems of man-in-the-world. Each of these writers captured some part of the spirit of their times, and their works in turn came to affect in a significant way how we define and formulate certain deep and pervasive moral and political issues.

In these respects, Laing might be considered the psychiatrist-philosopher of the sixties. There is a resonance between his work and prominent themes of the counterculture—alienation, estrangement, mysticism; antirationality, anti-establishment, antifamily.

[This is a summary or excerpt from the full text of the book or article. The full text of the document is available to subscribers.]

Copyright © 2021, Psychoanalytic Electronic Publishing, ISSN 2472-6982 Customer Service | Help | FAQ | Download PEP Bibliography | Report a Data Error | About

WARNING! This text is printed for personal use. It is copyright to the journal in which it originally appeared. It is illegal to redistribute it in any form.