Customer Service | Help | FAQ | PEP-Easy | Report a Data Error | About
:
Login
Tip: To share an article on social media…

PEP-Web Tip of the Day

If you find an article or content on PEP-Web interesting, you can share it with others using the Social Media Button at the bottom of every page.

For the complete list of tips, see PEP-Web Tips on the PEP-Web support page.

Kestenbaum, G.I. (1983). Toward a Definition of Intellectualization. Psychoanal. Contemp. Thought, 6(4):671-692.
  

(1983). Psychoanalysis and Contemporary Thought, 6(4):671-692

Toward a Definition of Intellectualization

Gerald I. Kestenbaum, Ph.D.

The central role of intellectualization as a defense was first discussed prominently by Anna Freud (1937) with regard to puberty and, as outlined by Gitelson (1944), is readily experienced daily by the psychotherapist in the form of patients' resistances and defense transferences. Indeed, Khan (1969) presents the much-shared view that most of the tenets of psychoanalytic technique regarding premature interpretation, working through, and allowing for the development of transference and regression are aimed at insuring a revivification of experience and insight and at avoiding the danger that a “talking cure” can result in intellectualized insight alone.

Despite the clinical prominence of defensive intellectualization very little is to be found in the literature about the process or mechanism involved. There also seems to be some question about its classification and its relation to other defense mechanisms. Anna Freud does not include intellectualization in her list of nine classical defense mechanisms (although she acknowledges its defensive role), and Schafer (1954) considers it a subset of isolation.

[This is a summary or excerpt from the full text of the book or article. The full text of the document is available to subscribers.]

Copyright © 2020, Psychoanalytic Electronic Publishing, ISSN 2472-6982 Customer Service | Help | FAQ | Download PEP Bibliography | Report a Data Error | About

WARNING! This text is printed for personal use. It is copyright to the journal in which it originally appeared. It is illegal to redistribute it in any form.