Customer Service | Help | FAQ | PEP-Easy | Report a Data Error | About
:
Login
Tip: To see definitions for highlighted words…

PEP-Web Tip of the Day

Some important words in PEP Web articles are highlighted when you place your mouse pointer over them. Clicking on the words will display a definition from a psychoanalytic dictionary in a small window.

For the complete list of tips, see PEP-Web Tips on the PEP-Web support page.

Klein, M.H. (1990). A Flaw in Grünbaum's Proof: Did Freud Empirically Verify His Theory of Paranoia?. Psychoanal. Contemp. Thought, 13(1):107-116.

(1990). Psychoanalysis and Contemporary Thought, 13(1):107-116

A Flaw in Grünbaum's Proof: Did Freud Empirically Verify His Theory of Paranoia?

Martin H. Klein, Ph.D.

According to Adolf Grünbaum (1984), Sigmund Freud, accomplished scientific methodologist that he was, did not accept his clinical theories on faith as Karl Popper (1962) would like us to believe, but in fact, did test his hypotheses empirically, employing the logical empirical method of verification. To support this claim, Grünbaum (1984) refers to Freud's (1915) paper, “A Case of Paranoia Running Counter to the Psycho-Analytic Theory of the Disease,” as documented proof of Freud's logical empirical occupation. According to Grünbaum, in this paper Freud empirically tested his psychoanalytic theory of paranoia by a method of verification resembling Popper's (1962) falsification model (p. 109).

To

[This is a summary or excerpt from the full text of the book or article. The full text of the document is available to subscribers.]

Copyright © 2019, Psychoanalytic Electronic Publishing, ISSN 2472-6982 Customer Service | Help | FAQ | Download PEP Bibliography | Report a Data Error | About

WARNING! This text is printed for personal use. It is copyright to the journal in which it originally appeared. It is illegal to redistribute it in any form.