Customer Service | Help | FAQ | PEP-Easy | Report a Data Error | About
:
Login
Tip: To see translations of this article…

PEP-Web Tip of the Day

When there are translations of the current article, you will see a flag/pennant icon next to the title, like this: 2015-11-06_11h14_24 For example:

2015-11-06_11h09_55

Click on it and you will see a bibliographic list of papers that are published translations of the current article. Note that when no published translations are available, you can also translate an article on the fly using Google translate.

 

For the complete list of tips, see PEP-Web Tips on the PEP-Web support page.

Thompson, A.E. (1990). The Ending to Dora's Story: Deutsch's Footnote as Narrative. Psychoanal. Contemp. Thought, 13(4):509-534.
   

(1990). Psychoanalysis and Contemporary Thought, 13(4):509-534

The Ending to Dora's Story: Deutsch's Footnote as Narrative

Anne E. Thompson, Ph.D.

One of the points made by Steven Marcus (1974) in his analysis of the case of Dora as a modernist narrative is that Freud, rather than Dora, becomes the central character in the narrative: We begin to sense that it is his story and not hers that is being retold. Instead of letting Dora appropriate her own story, Freud became the appropriator of it. The case history belongs progressively less to her than it does to him (p. 85). Marcus goes on to say: she refused to be a character in the story that Freud was composing for her, and wanted to finish it herself. As we now know, the ending she wrote was a very bad one indeed (p. 88).

The ending to which Marcus refers is that published by Felix Deutsch in 1957 under the title “A Footnote to Freud's ‘Fragment of an Analysis of a Case of Hysteria.’”

[This is a summary or excerpt from the full text of the book or article. The full text of the document is available to subscribers.]

Copyright © 2020, Psychoanalytic Electronic Publishing, ISSN 2472-6982 Customer Service | Help | FAQ | Download PEP Bibliography | Report a Data Error | About

WARNING! This text is printed for personal use. It is copyright to the journal in which it originally appeared. It is illegal to redistribute it in any form.