Customer Service | Help | FAQ | PEP-Easy | Report a Data Error | About
:
Login
Tip: To find a specific quote…

PEP-Web Tip of the Day

Trying to find a specific quote? Go to the Search section, and write it using quotation marks in “Search for Words or Phrases in Context.”

For the complete list of tips, see PEP-Web Tips on the PEP-Web support page.

Moncayo, R. (1998). True Subject Is No-subject: The Real, Imaginary, and Symbolic in Psychoanalysis and Zen Buddhism. Psychoanal. Contemp. Thought, 21(3):383-422.
   

(1998). Psychoanalysis and Contemporary Thought, 21(3):383-422

True Subject Is No-subject: The Real, Imaginary, and Symbolic in Psychoanalysis and Zen Buddhism

Raul Moncayo, Ph.D.

This paper contends that Lacanian psychoanalysis and Buddhism converge on the proposition that true self is no-self. It proposes that the Lacanian notion of the subject provides a viable alternative to either the psychoanalytic thesis of a substantial ego or the Buddhist pitfall of ignoring the significance of both language and a historical subject. Lacan's concept of the Real provides an answer to the critique that psychoanalysis lacks a positive psychology of meditation states. I differentiate between Imaginary, Symbolic, and Real dimensions of a divided and unified subject and between the heteronomy and autonomy of the unconscious, the ego, and the subject. The concept of insight is defined in terms of an “unknown knowing” that includes repressed knowing and the participation of the analyst in the larger nonrepressed structure of the Symbolic. Buddha-consciousness, as a consciousness beyond consciousness, and the psychical position of the analyst both constitute variations of

the seat of unknown-knowing. I differentiate between a conventional and an emancipatory function of language and argue that the Zen critique of language only applies to the former. The latter is articulated within a different conception of the Real found implicit in Lacan's work.

[This is a summary or excerpt from the full text of the book or article. The full text of the document is available to subscribers.]

Copyright © 2020, Psychoanalytic Electronic Publishing, ISSN 2472-6982 Customer Service | Help | FAQ | Download PEP Bibliography | Report a Data Error | About

WARNING! This text is printed for personal use. It is copyright to the journal in which it originally appeared. It is illegal to redistribute it in any form.