Customer Service | Help | FAQ | Report a Data Error | About
:
Login
Tip: To refine search by publication year…

PEP-Web Tip of the Day

Having problems finding an article? Writing the year of its publication in Search for Words or Phrases in Context will help narrow your search.

For the complete list of tips, see PEP-Web Tips on the PEP-Web support page.

Tansey, M.J. Burke, W.F. (1994). Transcending Interactional Tension: Commentary on Steven Stern's “Needed Relationships”. Psychoanal. Dial., 4(3):349-352.

(1994). Psychoanalytic Dialogues, 4(3):349-352

Transcending Interactional Tension: Commentary on Steven Stern's “Needed Relationships” Related Papers

Michael J. Tansey, Ph.D. and Walter F. Burke, Ph.D.

Steven Stern has proposed an integration of what Mitchell (1988) has labeled the relational-conflict perspective (Stern's Paradigm I) and the developmental-arrest perspective (Stern's Paradigm II). Although his undertaking is a laudable effort in which we share an interest (Tansey and Burke, 1989; Burke and Tansey, 1991), we find ourselves in strong disagreement with both the theoretical and technical implications underlying his argument. We focus our objections on three main points: his distinctions between “needed” versus “repeated” relational patterns; his extension of the concept of projective identification; and his conceptualization of his “true integration.”

Our clinical experience has led us toward an ever-increasing appreciation for the complexity of the therapeutic exchange and the simultaneity of “needed” and “repeated” dimensions of the therapeutic relationship. Although Stern mentions an “interweaving” in passing several times, fundamental to his argument is a sharp dichotomy between old, pathogenic, inauthentic, repeated therapeutic relationships requiring “mastery” and “transcendence” on the part of the analyst and new, healthy, authentic, needed therapeutic relationships that the therapist must strive to provide. In a clinical example used to illustrate his understanding of the “complex interweaving,” he describes his patient as alternating between an “unappealingly needy and whiny” presentation and one that is “appealingly vulnerable, forthright, and expressive.”

—————————————

Michael Tansey is Assistant Professor of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Northwestern University Medical School. Walter Burke is Director, Division of Psychology, Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, and Assistant Professor, Northwestern University Medical School. They coauthored Understanding Countertransference (The Analytic Press, 1989).

© 1994 The Analytic Press

- 349 -

[This is a summary or excerpt from the full text of the book or article. The full text of the document is available to subscribers.]

Copyright © 2017, Psychoanalytic Electronic Publishing, ISSN 2472-6982 Customer Service | Help | FAQ | Download PEP Bibliography | Report a Data Error | About

WARNING! This text is printed for personal use. It is copyright to the journal in which it originally appeared. It is illegal to redistribute it in any form.