Customer Service | Help | FAQ | PEP-Easy | Report a Data Error | About
Tip: To go directly to an article using its bibliographical details…

PEP-Web Tip of the Day

If you know the bibliographic details of a journal article, use the Journal Section to find it quickly. First, find and click on the Journal where the article was published in the Journal tab on the home page. Then, click on the year of publication. Finally, look for the author’s name or the title of the article in the table of contents and click on it to see the article.

For the complete list of tips, see PEP-Web Tips on the PEP-Web support page.

Mitchell, S.A. (1996). Editorial Statement. Psychoanal. Dial., 6(1):1-3.

(1996). Psychoanalytic Dialogues, 6(1):1-3

Editorial Statement

Stephen A. Mitchell, Ph.D.

This issue marks the fifth anniversary of psychoanalytic Dialogues, a suitable occasion to note the enormous changes in the world of psychoanalysis, both in the United States and internationally, in the few short years since our inception.

When Psychoanalytic Dialogues was first conceived, the relational perspectives it hoped to provide expression for constituted, if not voices in the wilderness, certainly nonmainstream viewpoints. Object relations theories, interpersonal psychoanalysis, self psychology—all had established important presences on the psychoanalytic scene but were regarded largely as secondary offshoots, peripheral developments, and, as such, were markedly underrepresented in the traditional journals. In these few short years, there has been a gradual but clear shift in the center of gravity within the psychoanalytic world, with relational-model thinking and clinical sensibilities now occupying a central place, both in theorizing and in clinical practice. Over this brief span, all the major American psychoanalytic journals have changed editorship and have a new look, both literally and metaphorically. In most quarters, there has developed a refreshing sense of openness to comparative theory and technique and a greater receptivity to new ideas and clear evidence of the impact relational thinking, in its various forms, has had on contemporary psychoanalytic thought and practice.

These developments are all extremely welcome ones, and those of us who have shaped and guided Psychoanalytic Dialogues are very gratified with respect to the role we have played in them. But they also necessitate a new set of concerns for authors from relational perspectives that Psychoanalytic Dialogues would like to help bring into focus.


[This is a summary or excerpt from the full text of the book or article. The full text of the document is available to subscribers.]

Copyright © 2021, Psychoanalytic Electronic Publishing, ISSN 2472-6982 Customer Service | Help | FAQ | Download PEP Bibliography | Report a Data Error | About

WARNING! This text is printed for personal use. It is copyright to the journal in which it originally appeared. It is illegal to redistribute it in any form.