Customer Service | Help | FAQ | PEP-Easy | Report a Data Error | About
:
Login
Tip: To access to IJP Open with a PEP-Web subscription…

PEP-Web Tip of the Day

Having a PEP-Web subscription grants you access to IJP Open. This new feature allows you to access and review some articles of the International Journal of Psychoanalysis before their publication. The free subscription to IJP Open is required, and you can access it by clicking here.

For the complete list of tips, see PEP-Web Tips on the PEP-Web support page.

Sherman, E. (2002). “Dirty,” “Clean,” and In-Between—Rolling with Uncertainty in Homoerotic Countertransference: Reply to Commentaries. Psychoanal. Dial., 12(4):687-691.

(2002). Psychoanalytic Dialogues, 12(4):687-691

“Dirty,” “Clean,” and In-Between—Rolling with Uncertainty in Homoerotic Countertransference: Reply to Commentaries Related Papers

Eric Sherman, C.S.W., L.C.S.W.

Elise and Frommer Further “Roll out” my Ideas on Erotic countertransference by introducing important aspects of gender, development, transgression, and power dynamics between gay men. Their insights contribute rich new ways to consider my work with Kevin and add to the complexity that makes same-sex desire such a Janus-faced dilemma of danger and potential.

In addressing the transgressive nature of same-sex desire, both authors further explicate (and necessarily complicate) the sense of “badness,” “dirtiness,” excitement, and dread that pervade male homoerotic transference dynamics. The prevalence of both avoidance and dissociation—even the sense that sexual feelings have been “thrust” upon us—is further understood through this important dynamic. Elise's conceptualization of terror of the vulnerable, “vaginal” opening in men fits well with Frommer's ideas on the strutting of sexualized hypermasculinity to repudiate what is thought to be feminine. I was particularly interested in Elise's consideration of same-sex desire as a doubly transgressive action against the heterosexual, reproductive couple. It made me think about all the interconnected layers of shame, transgression, and taboo that have had a stranglehold on Kevin, including the terrible, literal playing out of “Lauis's curse” with Fred. In this case, the son was taken by the stepfather, “killing off” both the mother and the already (symbolically) dead father (longed for all the more as Kevin struggled with his sexuality without a strong male role model). Also transgressed was society's—and the patient's—sense of what is normal and acceptable.

[This is a summary or excerpt from the full text of the book or article. The full text of the document is available to subscribers.]

Copyright © 2020, Psychoanalytic Electronic Publishing, ISSN 2472-6982 Customer Service | Help | FAQ | Download PEP Bibliography | Report a Data Error | About

WARNING! This text is printed for personal use. It is copyright to the journal in which it originally appeared. It is illegal to redistribute it in any form.