Customer Service | Help | FAQ | PEP-Easy | Report a Data Error | About
Tip: To see author affiliation information in an article…

PEP-Web Tip of the Day

To see author affiliation and contact information (as available) in an article, simply click on the Information icon next to the author’s name in every journal article.

For the complete list of tips, see PEP-Web Tips on the PEP-Web support page.

Gerson, S. (2006). The Elusiveness of the Relational Unconscious: Commentary on Paper by Juan Taubert-Oklander. Psychoanal. Dial., 16(2):217-225.

(2006). Psychoanalytic Dialogues, 16(2):217-225

The Elusiveness of the Relational Unconscious: Commentary on Paper by Juan Taubert-Oklander Related Papers

Samuel Gerson, Ph.D.

Even as relational perspectives on the psychoanalytic process are increasingly endorsed, their implications for theory and clinical practice are far from full development. In this commentary on Juan Tubert-Oklander's work, I first highlight his theoretical contribution to an intersubjective understanding of the unconscious. I then critique his clinical vignette for its surprising omission of this concept of a relational unconscious in his description of the interpretive process. Thinking and writing about clinical work with, and within, the relational unconscious poses the particular problem of having to proceed with uncertainty about how interpretive convictions may reflect the nature of one's own unconscious participation in the structuring of the analytic process.

[This is a summary or excerpt from the full text of the book or article. The full text of the document is available to subscribers.]

Copyright © 2020, Psychoanalytic Electronic Publishing, ISSN 2472-6982 Customer Service | Help | FAQ | Download PEP Bibliography | Report a Data Error | About

WARNING! This text is printed for personal use. It is copyright to the journal in which it originally appeared. It is illegal to redistribute it in any form.