Customer Service | Help | FAQ | Report a Data Error | About
:
Login
Tip: To download the bibliographic list of all PEP-Web content…

PEP-Web Tip of the Day

Did you know that you can download a bibliography of all content available on PEP Web to import to Endnote, Refer, or other bibliography manager?  Just click on the link found at the bottom of the webpage. You can import into any UTF-8 (Unicode) compatible software which can import data in “Refer” format.  You can get a free trial of one such program, Endnote, by clicking here.

For the complete list of tips, see PEP-Web Tips on the PEP-Web support page.

Tubert-Oklander, J. (2006). On the Inherent Relationality of the Unconscious: Reply to Commentary. Psychoanal. Dial., 16(2):227-239.

(2006). Psychoanalytic Dialogues, 16(2):227-239

On the Inherent Relationality of the Unconscious: Reply to Commentary Related Papers

Juan Tubert-Oklander, M.D.

Because I consider the unconscious to be inherently relational, I do not see a need to use the term relational unconscious, where unconscious would suffice. The unconscious is defined by its inaccessibility; it underlies all human affairs, irrespective of the number of people involved. The minimum unit of observation in clinical psychoanalysis includes two people and a context. My approach to the interpretive process is that of a free-floating dialogue between analyst and patient, a verbal play, equivalent to Winnicott's “squiggle game,” which allows the emergence of a new pattern in their mutual communication, thus developing new meanings. The interpretive process is, therefore, an unconscious mental evolution, independent from both parties' conscious will and control, which generates an ever-increasing awareness in their relation. The interweaving of their mental processes generates shared unconscious bastions of resistance, which need be identified and analyzed. This is a universal phenomenon, a necessary phase in the development of insight.

I discuss the reviewer's comments and additional interpretations of the underlying dynamics of the clinical vignette presented in my original article, showing their points of agreement and disagreement.

[This is a summary or excerpt from the full text of the book or article. The full text of the document is available to subscribers.]

Copyright © 2017, Psychoanalytic Electronic Publishing, ISSN 2472-6982 Customer Service | Help | FAQ | Download PEP Bibliography | Report a Data Error | About

WARNING! This text is printed for personal use. It is copyright to the journal in which it originally appeared. It is illegal to redistribute it in any form.