Customer Service | Help | FAQ | Report a Data Error | About
Tip: To see papers related to the one you are viewing…

PEP-Web Tip of the Day

When there are articles or videos related to the one you are viewing, you will see a related papers icon next to the title, like this: RelatedPapers32Final3For example:


Click on it and you will see a bibliographic list of papers that are related (including the current one).  Related papers may be papers which are commentaries, responses to commentaries, erratum, and videos discussing the paper.  Since they are not part of the original source material, they are added by PEP editorial staff, and may not be marked as such in every possible case.


For the complete list of tips, see PEP-Web Tips on the PEP-Web support page.

Wilson, M. (2017). The Fragility of the Frame. Psychoanal. Dial., 27(3):361-362.

(2017). Psychoanalytic Dialogues, 27(3):361-362

The Fragility of the Frame

Mitchell Wilson, M.D.

The fragility of the psychoanalytic setup––what we now call the frame––becomes a felt fact whenever there is significant disruption. Imagine your office is flooded because of a broken pipe or corroded water heater. To put things back together such that your office looks like your office again first entails taking it all apart, from the carpet to the baseboards, and

- 361 -

moving various pieces of furniture, including the analytic couch, to a safe perch. You realize, with a shocking immediacy, that your workspace, that place where you lay it on the line every day, is constructed, highly fabricated, because it can so easily be de-constructed, even destroyed.

The psychoanalytic frame, as we know, entails more than the physical space in which we work. It involves the psychic space through which we work such that analysis has a chance to happen between our patients and us. The frame is something we both facilitate and inhabit, and that we invest with specific values, such as care and responsibility for the other. For me, one essential feature of the frame is that it contains an analytic relationship that is fundamentally asymmetric. As Laplanche rightly insisted upon, the analytic situation recapitulates the primary anthropological situation of early infancy. Transference, desire, and fantasy all follow from this recapitulation. And because of the vectors of force that get mobilized in analysis, the analyst has a deeply ethical responsibility to care for

[This is a summary excerpt from the full text of the journal article. The full text of the document is available to journal subscribers on the publisher's website here.]

Copyright © 2017, Psychoanalytic Electronic Publishing, ISSN 2472-6982 Customer Service | Help | FAQ | Download PEP Bibliography | Report a Data Error | About

WARNING! This text is printed for personal use. It is copyright to the journal in which it originally appeared. It is illegal to redistribute it in any form.