Customer Service | Help | FAQ | PEP-Easy | Report a Data Error | About
:
Login
Tip: To see translations of this article…

PEP-Web Tip of the Day

When there are translations of the current article, you will see a flag/pennant icon next to the title, like this: 2015-11-06_11h14_24 For example:

2015-11-06_11h09_55

Click on it and you will see a bibliographic list of papers that are published translations of the current article. Note that when no published translations are available, you can also translate an article on the fly using Google translate.

 

For the complete list of tips, see PEP-Web Tips on the PEP-Web support page.

Bornstein, M. Mayman, M. Gonzalez, R. Silver, D. Smith, S. (1981). Epilogue. Psychoanal. Inq., 1(2):317-319.

(1981). Psychoanalytic Inquiry, 1(2):317-319

Epilogue Related Papers

Melvin Bornstein, M.D., Martin Mayman, Ph.D., Raphael Gonzalez, M.D., Donald Silver, M.D. and Sydney Smith, Ph.D.

If, as Gedo asserts, psychoanalysis must cope with a loss of favor from without and confidence from within, the commentaries presented in this issue of Psychoanalytic Inquiry illustrate that a worthy group of thinkers and clinicians are available to respond to whatever challenges face our discipline. The foundation for Gedo's theory rests primarily on information derived from analytic work with the more difficult cases. He also derives support from literature citing observations on infancy. Responses to new data from within and outside the analytic consulting room are always greatly varied, ranging from eager acceptance to intense skepticism. Gedo's views describe himself as traditional in some respects and radical in others. The essayists present varied opinions as to which of Gedo's proposals are conventional and which are radical revisions. There is, however, unanimous agreement that Beyond Interpretation is a controversial and provocative book.

As we consider the commentaries, we are impressed that ideas once strange and seemingly unacceptable have gradually become integrated into the body of psychoanalytic discourse. Self and identity seem to be such ideas. Gedo's conception of a self-organization builds on this tradition, and it seems to arouse almost none of the strong objections some of its conceptual predecessors did. Of course, neither does Gedo's self-organization receive immediate acceptance, but its merit is discussed in the context of its general heuristic fit and with a more open mind as to its worth in comparison with the traditional structural hypothesis. Similarly, we note that the argument over the necessity for an economic point of view, built around qualitative changes in psychic energy, seems to have receded to a mild protest by some and to being ignored by others.

In

[This is a summary or excerpt from the full text of the book or article. The full text of the document is available to subscribers.]

Copyright © 2019, Psychoanalytic Electronic Publishing, ISSN 2472-6982 Customer Service | Help | FAQ | Download PEP Bibliography | Report a Data Error | About

WARNING! This text is printed for personal use. It is copyright to the journal in which it originally appeared. It is illegal to redistribute it in any form.