Customer Service | Help | FAQ | PEP-Easy | Report a Data Error | About
PEP-Easy Tip: To save PEP-Easy to the home screen

PEP-Web Tip of the Day

To start PEP-Easy without first opening your browser–just as you would start a mobile app, you can save a shortcut to your home screen.

First, in Chrome or Safari, depending on your platform, open PEP-Easy from You want to be on the default start screen, so you have a clean workspace.

Then, depending on your mobile device…follow the instructions below:


  1. Tap on the share icon Action navigation bar and tab bar icon
  2. In the bottom list, tap on ‘Add to home screen’
  3. In the “Add to Home” confirmation “bubble”, tap “Add”

On Android:

  1. Tap on the Chrome menu (Vertical Ellipses)
  2. Select “Add to Home Screen” from the menu


For the complete list of tips, see PEP-Web Tips on the PEP-Web support page.

Tyson, P. (1991). Some Nuclear Conflicts of Infantile Neurosis in Female Development. Psychoanal. Inq., 11(4):582-601.

(1991). Psychoanalytic Inquiry, 11(4):582-601

Some Nuclear Conflicts of Infantile Neurosis in Female Development

Phyllis Tyson, Ph.D.

Freud, in addition to his famous question, also remarked that “Throughout history people have knocked their heads against the riddle of the nature of femininity” (1933p. 113). Might this still be the case today? Although we have learned much in the last 60 years, we still have no generally accepted formulation of female psychology. We have instead a wide variety of conflicting theories.

Freud's emphasis on sexuality has had an enduring influence; indeed, writers as diverse as Bonaparte (1953), Chasseguet-Smirgel (1970), and Lacan (1982) consider various issues touching on female psychology, but they all write under the title of “sexuality.” The emphasis on sexuality is apparent in the great concentration of attention over the years directed toward confirming or refuting Freud's (1937) idea that penis envy is bedrock and that women invariably suffer a sense of castration. Sexuality is also apparent in accounts of female development that put heavy emphasis on the organizing effects of genital awareness. Roiphe and Galenson (1981), for example, stress the psychological consequences of awareness of genital differences.

[This is a summary or excerpt from the full text of the book or article. The full text of the document is available to subscribers.]

Copyright © 2020, Psychoanalytic Electronic Publishing, ISSN 2472-6982 Customer Service | Help | FAQ | Download PEP Bibliography | Report a Data Error | About

WARNING! This text is printed for personal use. It is copyright to the journal in which it originally appeared. It is illegal to redistribute it in any form.