Customer Service | Help | FAQ | PEP-Easy | Report a Data Error | About
:
Login
PEP-Easy Tip: To save PEP-Easy to the home screen

PEP-Web Tip of the Day

To start PEP-Easy without first opening your browser–just as you would start a mobile app, you can save a shortcut to your home screen.

First, in Chrome or Safari, depending on your platform, open PEP-Easy from pepeasy.pep-web.org. You want to be on the default start screen, so you have a clean workspace.

Then, depending on your mobile device…follow the instructions below:

On IOS:

  1. Tap on the share icon Action navigation bar and tab bar icon
  2. In the bottom list, tap on ‘Add to home screen’
  3. In the “Add to Home” confirmation “bubble”, tap “Add”

On Android:

  1. Tap on the Chrome menu (Vertical Ellipses)
  2. Select “Add to Home Screen” from the menu

 

For the complete list of tips, see PEP-Web Tips on the PEP-Web support page.

Gedo, J.E. (1994). Academicism, Romanticism, and Science in the Psychoanalytic Enterprise. Psychoanal. Inq., 14(2):295-312.

(1994). Psychoanalytic Inquiry, 14(2):295-312

Academicism, Romanticism, and Science in the Psychoanalytic Enterprise

John E. Gedo, M.D.

Over ten years ago, psychoanalytic inquiry devoted one issue (vol. 1, no. 2) to a series of commentaries on my then-recent book Beyond Interpretation (Gedo, 1979a). In my response to those critiques (Gedo, 1981), I tried to articulate the complex feelings stirred up by such attention to one's work, and I shall refrain from repeating such a litany of gratitude, pride, amazement, and despair here. I trust that, in any case, my emotional responses to the essays in this issue will be clear from the manner of my presentation. Suffice it to say at the outset that, in the interval since 1981, a decisive change has taken place in the attitudes of commentators on work as radical as mine has been: whereas, a decade ago, the burden of proof was placed on the person who dared to challenge the conventional wisdom, all of the contributors to the current effort seem to agree that at present there is no consensus about fundamental matters within psychoanalysis, so that unusual viewpoints may deserve as much attention and respect as any others. It is a refreshing change, at long last, to receive the benefit of most doubts.

Almost without exception, the essayists have surveyed my writings carefully and have grasped my intended meanings.

[This is a summary or excerpt from the full text of the book or article. The full text of the document is available to subscribers.]

Copyright © 2021, Psychoanalytic Electronic Publishing, ISSN 2472-6982 Customer Service | Help | FAQ | Download PEP Bibliography | Report a Data Error | About

WARNING! This text is printed for personal use. It is copyright to the journal in which it originally appeared. It is illegal to redistribute it in any form.