Customer Service | Help | FAQ | PEP-Easy | Report a Data Error | About
:
Login
Tip: To review an author’s works published in PEP-Web…

PEP-Web Tip of the Day

The Author Section is a useful way to review an author’s works published in PEP-Web. It is ordered alphabetically by the Author’s surname. After clicking the matching letter, search for the author’s full name.

For the complete list of tips, see PEP-Web Tips on the PEP-Web support page.

Busch, F. (1998). Self-Disclosure Ain't What It's Cracked Up To Be, At Least Not Yet. Psychoanal. Inq., 18(4):518-529.

(1998). Psychoanalytic Inquiry, 18(4):518-529

Self-Disclosure Ain't What It's Cracked Up To Be, At Least Not Yet

Fred Busch, Ph.D.

At a recent national meeting I heard an analyst describe his rationale for answering a question posed by a patient regarding the analyst's forthcoming holiday plans as based on a more open, nonauthoritarian style in the spirit of interactive collaboration. While a spirit of generosity underlies such an assertion, it represents a sophistry of the type it was designed to replace (i.e., the silent analyst as the benign blank screen). Just as the analyst's silence can represent powerful listening or hostile withdrawal, the analyst's self-disclosure is inherently neither better nor worse then silence, and in fact can represent a myriad of attitudes toward the analysand. Its meaning can best be found within the framework of the analytic situation, bound by the context of the multiple motivations within the analytic dyad. What on the surface may seem to be a humane gesture can in fact be a sadistic reenactment, while what seems like sterile listening can be a most humane gesture.

A not uncommon scenario for certain types of patients is to grow up believing that in order to survive, they need to be a narcissistic object for a parent. These patients become experts at reading the unconscious needs of those around them, including their analyst. Unconsciously sensing the analyst's need for attention at certain key times, they strategically ask questions of the analyst's activities. In such a situation, the analyst's answering could be a subtle enactment of a narcissistically enhancing, authoritarian relationship, in which the patient's sense of self is being destroyed.

[This is a summary or excerpt from the full text of the book or article. The full text of the document is available to subscribers.]

Copyright © 2019, Psychoanalytic Electronic Publishing, ISSN 2472-6982 Customer Service | Help | FAQ | Download PEP Bibliography | Report a Data Error | About

WARNING! This text is printed for personal use. It is copyright to the journal in which it originally appeared. It is illegal to redistribute it in any form.