Customer Service | Help | FAQ | PEP-Easy | Report a Data Error | About
Tip: To search for text within the article you are viewing…

PEP-Web Tip of the Day

You can use the search tool of your web browser to perform an additional search within the current article (the one you are viewing). Simply press Ctrl + F on a Windows computer, or Command + F if you are using an Apple computer.

For the complete list of tips, see PEP-Web Tips on the PEP-Web support page.

Orange, D.M. Stolorow, R.D. (1998). Self-Disclosure from the Perspective Of Intersubjectivity Theory. Psychoanal. Inq., 18(4):530-537.

(1998). Psychoanalytic Inquiry, 18(4):530-537

Self-Disclosure from the Perspective Of Intersubjectivity Theory

Donna M. Orange, Ph.D. and Robert D. Stolorow, Ph.D.

In an earlier contribution (Orange, Atwood, and Stolorow, 1997), we explained that the concept of practice better describes psychoanalytic clinical work than does the venerable notion of technique. We argued that although technique and technical rationality are appropriate in working with things without minds, where more variables can be controlled and experimentation can be replicated, practice and practical wisdom better suit work with human beings. It is no accident that people speak of the “practice” of law and medicine.

The misapplication of the concept of technique in psychoanalysis is nowhere more evident than in discussions of self-disclosure. Only by conceiving of psychoanalysis primarily as an empirical science requiring rigid controls over intervening variables could we imagine that self-disclosure could be regulated by rule or precept or even by “technical recommendation.”

[This is a summary or excerpt from the full text of the book or article. The full text of the document is available to subscribers.]

Copyright © 2019, Psychoanalytic Electronic Publishing, ISSN 2472-6982 Customer Service | Help | FAQ | Download PEP Bibliography | Report a Data Error | About

WARNING! This text is printed for personal use. It is copyright to the journal in which it originally appeared. It is illegal to redistribute it in any form.