Customer Service | Help | FAQ | PEP-Easy | Report a Data Error | About
:
Login
Tip: To see the German word that Freud used to refer to a concept…

PEP-Web Tip of the Day

Want to know the exact German word that Freud used to refer to a psychoanalytic concept? Move your mouse over a paragraph while reading The Standard Edition of the Complete Psychological Works of Sigmund Freud and a window will emerge displaying the text in its original German version.

For the complete list of tips, see PEP-Web Tips on the PEP-Web support page.

Malin, B.D. (1998). Epilogue. Psychoanal. Inq., 18(5):746-762.

(1998). Psychoanalytic Inquiry, 18(5):746-762

Epilogue

Barnet D. Malin, M.D.

Daughter: Daddy, what is an instinct?

Father: An instinct, my dear, is an explanatory principle.

D: But what does it explain?

F: Anything—almost anything at all. Anything you want it to explain.

From “Metalogue: What Is an Instinct?” in Steps to an Ecology of Mind, Gregory Bateson, 1972p. 38.

Why is studying the relationship between psychoanalysis and psychopharmacology so difficult? Several decades ago, the explanatory principles of psychoanalytic ego psychology structured the issue relatively clearly: psychotropic medications interfere with the psychoanalytic process because they alter symptoms that, as the products of neurotic defenses against drive derivatives, serve as motivation for transference and treatment. This point of view generated fantasies of all sorts that still haunt the shadows of our literature on the subject. Using psychotropic medications in an analysis can feel like committing a dirty, secret act evoking mixtures of shame and hope. Prescribing medications may seem to be the “Hail Mary” play of psychoanalytic work: when transference fails, try Tofranil. Medications can seem like a plague of insects: they're here; we don't want them; they are ruthlessly efficient, impossible to get rid of, unstoppable; and they are wrecking our way of life. Medications threaten our omnipotent beliefs in our powers as analysts. Perhaps at the heart of these collective fantasies is our fear that psychopharmacology and those who practice it will put us out of business. It is no wonder that this “presence in the room” has frequently been welcomed with closed arms.

[This is a summary or excerpt from the full text of the book or article. The full text of the document is available to subscribers.]

Copyright © 2019, Psychoanalytic Electronic Publishing, ISSN 2472-6982 Customer Service | Help | FAQ | Download PEP Bibliography | Report a Data Error | About

WARNING! This text is printed for personal use. It is copyright to the journal in which it originally appeared. It is illegal to redistribute it in any form.