Customer Service | Help | FAQ | Report a Data Error | About
:
Login
Tip: To bookmark an article…

PEP-Web Tip of the Day

Want to save an article in your browser’s Bookmarks for quick access? Press Ctrl + D and a dialogue box will open asking how you want to save it.

For the complete list of tips, see PEP-Web Tips on the PEP-Web support page.

Carr, E. Nachman, P. (2017). “Just Have Fun”—Epilogue: Daniel Stern: Contributions to Psychoanalysis and Developmental Psychology, Part I. Psychoanal. Inq., 37(4):270-273.

(2017). Psychoanalytic Inquiry, 37(4):270-273

Epilogue

“Just Have Fun”—Epilogue: Daniel Stern: Contributions to Psychoanalysis and Developmental Psychology, Part I

Elizabeth M. Carr, A.P.R.N., M.S.N., B.C. and Patricia Nachman, Ph.D.

Robert Emde describes the appealing qualities of playfulness and aliveness that Daniel Stern brought to living and to his life’s work. Having been both a friend and a collaborator, Emde summarizes the contributions of Stern beginning with his writings about modes of intersubjectivity (self and self-with-other experience) that have contributed to a transformational shift in psychoanalytic thinking, particularly with regard to early development. Before Stern, the word intersubjectivity was virtually absent within psychoanalytic discourse; now it is a central aspect of our discourse.

Emde describes Stern’s thinking regarding the curative factors in psychoanalysis, focusing especially on the implicit processes of clinical interaction. Stern believed that repeated intersubjective exchanges between patient and analyst, operating primarily at the implicit level, give rise to emergent experience that promotes expanded self-with-other schemas. These moments involve both meaningful connection (a sense of being in sync with each other) and, at other times, mismatches that provide opportunities for negotiation and correction. In this, new relational ways of being and being with another are developed. Importantly, as described by Emde, Stern believed these intersubjective moments of meeting do not require verbalization to have their therapeutic effects. This point alone has captured the conversation of much of contemporary psychoanalytic thinking from a variety of theoretical

[This is a summary excerpt from the full text of the journal article. The full text of the document is available to journal subscribers on the publisher's website here.]

Copyright © 2017, Psychoanalytic Electronic Publishing, ISSN 2472-6982 Customer Service | Help | FAQ | Download PEP Bibliography | Report a Data Error | About

WARNING! This text is printed for personal use. It is copyright to the journal in which it originally appeared. It is illegal to redistribute it in any form.