Customer Service | Help | FAQ | PEP-Easy | Report a Data Error | About
:
Login
Tip: To zoom in or out on PEP-Web…

PEP-Web Tip of the Day

Are you having difficulty reading an article due its font size? In order to make the content on PEP-Web larger (zoom in), press Ctrl (on Windows) or ⌘Command (on the Mac) and the plus sign (+). Press Ctrl (on Windows) or ⌘Command (on the Mac) and the minus sign (-) to make the content smaller (zoom out). To go back to 100% size (normal size), press Ctrl (⌘Command on the Mac) + 0 (the number 0).

Another way on Windows: Hold the Ctrl key and scroll the mouse wheel up or down to zoom in and out (respectively) of the webpage. Laptop users may use two fingers and separate them or bring them together while pressing the mouse track pad.

Safari users: You can also improve the readability of you browser when using Safari, with the Reader Mode: Go to PEP-Web. Right-click the URL box and select Settings for This Website, or go to Safari > Settings for This Website. A large pop-up will appear underneath the URL box. Look for the header that reads, “When visiting this website.” If you want Reader mode to always work on this site, check the box for “Use Reader when available.”

For the complete list of tips, see PEP-Web Tips on the PEP-Web support page.

Hoffer, P.T. (2011). Reply to “On Ferenczi: A Response”: Notes from Elasticity to the Confusion of Tongues and the Technical Dimensions of Ferenczi's Approach by B. William Brennan ThM MA LHMC. Psychoanal. Perspect., 8(1):22-24.

(2011). Psychoanalytic Perspectives, 8(1):22-24

Reply to “On Ferenczi: A Response”: Notes from Elasticity to the Confusion of Tongues and the Technical Dimensions of Ferenczi's Approach by B. William Brennan ThM MA LHMC

Peter T. Hoffer, Ph.D.

I AM PLEASED AND HONORED TO BE GIVEN THE OPPORTUNITY TO RESPOND to B. William Brennan's response to my paper, “From Elasticity to the Confusion of Tongues: A Historical Commentary on the Technical Dimension of the Freud/Ferenczi Controversy,” which was published in the recent Ferenczi issue of Psychoanalytic Perspectives. I would like to state at the outset that I read Brennan's paper with keen interest and consider it a valuable complement to my paper, which, as a historical narrative, attempts to capture the spirit and some of the substance of a critical period in the relationship between Freud and Ferenczi—and in the history of psychoanalysis—as experienced by the principals in the controversy, along with some of their noteworthy colleagues. It was not my intention to favor one side or the other or to reach any definitive conclusions, but rather to let the principals express themselves, as much as possible in their own words, and to let history make the final determination as to the validity of their respective positions.

[This is a summary or excerpt from the full text of the book or article. The full text of the document is available to subscribers.]

Copyright © 2019, Psychoanalytic Electronic Publishing, ISSN 2472-6982 Customer Service | Help | FAQ | Download PEP Bibliography | Report a Data Error | About

WARNING! This text is printed for personal use. It is copyright to the journal in which it originally appeared. It is illegal to redistribute it in any form.