Customer Service | Help | FAQ | PEP-Easy | Report a Data Error | About
:
Login
Tip: To share an article on social media…

PEP-Web Tip of the Day

If you find an article or content on PEP-Web interesting, you can share it with others using the Social Media Button at the bottom of every page.

For the complete list of tips, see PEP-Web Tips on the PEP-Web support page.

Starr, K.E. Aron, L. (2013). Deconstructing the Psychotherapy/Psychoanalysis Binary—The Case for Optimal Marginality: Commentary on Paper by Kenneth Frank. Psychoanal. Perspect., 10(2):335-349.

(2013). Psychoanalytic Perspectives, 10(2):335-349

Deconstructing the Psychotherapy/Psychoanalysis Binary—The Case for Optimal Marginality: Commentary on Paper by Kenneth Frank

Karen E. Starr, PsyD and Lewis Aron, PhD

Ken Frank has passionately argued that in order to emerge from its current crisis of marginalization, psychoanalysis must be willing to engage ideas from other disciplines, including integration with other psychotherapies. The authors agree with Frank that psychoanalysis is at a crossroads, but argue that calling for psychotherapy integration is not sufficient. Rather, in order for psychoanalysis to thrive and not merely survive, it is essential to understand the historical, cultural, and economic factors that have led to its isolation from other psychotherapies. Specifically, the authors examine how psychoanalysis came to define itself so narrowly, and by opposing itself to psychotherapy. Second, they argue that psychoanalysis is at its best not when it is part of the mainstream, but when it is “optimally marginal.” They show that Freud and the early analysts were caught between two worlds, situated at the margins of their society, and that it was precisely this position that allowed them to develop a psychoanalytic sensibility. In offering this brief cultural history and deconstructing the psychoanalysis/psychotherapy binary, the authors hope to provide the background for envisioning a progressive psychoanalysis that moves beyond old polarities and adapts to our changed world, while remaining true to the revolutionary and humanistic spirit of Freud and his followers: a “psychotherapy for the people” (Aron & Starr, 2013; Freud, 1919, p. 168).

[This is a summary excerpt from the full text of the journal article. The full text of the document is available to journal subscribers on the publisher's website here.]

Copyright © 2021, Psychoanalytic Electronic Publishing, ISSN 2472-6982 Customer Service | Help | FAQ | Download PEP Bibliography | Report a Data Error | About

WARNING! This text is printed for personal use. It is copyright to the journal in which it originally appeared. It is illegal to redistribute it in any form.