Customer Service | Help | FAQ | PEP-Easy | Report a Data Error | About
PEP-Easy Tip: To save PEP-Easy to the home screen

PEP-Web Tip of the Day

To start PEP-Easy without first opening your browser–just as you would start a mobile app, you can save a shortcut to your home screen.

First, in Chrome or Safari, depending on your platform, open PEP-Easy from You want to be on the default start screen, so you have a clean workspace.

Then, depending on your mobile device…follow the instructions below:


  1. Tap on the share icon Action navigation bar and tab bar icon
  2. In the bottom list, tap on ‘Add to home screen’
  3. In the “Add to Home” confirmation “bubble”, tap “Add”

On Android:

  1. Tap on the Chrome menu (Vertical Ellipses)
  2. Select “Add to Home Screen” from the menu


For the complete list of tips, see PEP-Web Tips on the PEP-Web support page.

Pine, F. (1986). Margaret S. Mahler, M.D. In Memoriam. Psychoanal. Psychol., 3(2):101-103.

(1986). Psychoanalytic Psychology, 3(2):101-103

Margaret S. Mahler, M.D. In Memoriam

Fred Pine, Ph.D.

On October 2, 1985, Margaret Mahler died at the age of 88. In the last quarter century, she had been a central figure on the world stage of psychoanalysis.

Mahler was fond of dating her first impressions of the centrality of what she later called symbiosis and separation-individuation, to her work in a wellbaby clinic in Vienna in the period before World War II. Certainly her respect for the data base of mother-child interactions grew there, complementing her experience with the data base of analytic productions on the couch. And certainly, like Spitz and Winnicott, she was impressed in those observations with both the intimacy and intensity of those mother-child interactions, and with the necessity of thinking developmentally in terms of the discovery of the personal self and of the intertwined yet separate other. But equally certainly, she brought to these observations an exquisite sensitivity to aspects of mother-infant dyads that could only have been honed in personal history and which, fortunately, she was able to transform into creative thought.

Though her ideas are now widely known, it is not widely known how much she was truly a researcher. Regularly, when we were deluged by the flood of data that observational/longitudinal studies inevitably generate, hers was an insistent voice against the temptation to shift to individual case studies as a way of helping us keep our heads above water with respect to those data. She had a great deal of respect for a research method anchored in repeated encounters with a phenomenon observed in different children and at different times—essentially a Piagetian method applied to the realm of mother-infant interaction. And she was equally insistent upon the need for multiple observers; she knew the role of subjectivity in observational work, and knew the difference between observation and inference, and consensual validation was an idea that mattered to her in the face of these difficulties.

Two qualities of her thinking come to mind, and I should like to say a word about each of them: creative ignorance and impassioned study of microscopic detail.

[This is a summary or excerpt from the full text of the book or article. The full text of the document is available to subscribers.]

Copyright © 2019, Psychoanalytic Electronic Publishing, ISSN 2472-6982 Customer Service | Help | FAQ | Download PEP Bibliography | Report a Data Error | About

WARNING! This text is printed for personal use. It is copyright to the journal in which it originally appeared. It is illegal to redistribute it in any form.