Customer Service | Help | FAQ | PEP-Easy | Report a Data Error | About
Tip: To see translations of this article…

PEP-Web Tip of the Day

When there are translations of the current article, you will see a flag/pennant icon next to the title, like this: 2015-11-06_11h14_24 For example:


Click on it and you will see a bibliographic list of papers that are published translations of the current article. Note that when no published translations are available, you can also translate an article on the fly using Google translate.


For the complete list of tips, see PEP-Web Tips on the PEP-Web support page.

Tolmacz, R. (2006). Concern: A Comparative Look. Psychoanal. Psychol., 23(1):143-158.

(2006). Psychoanalytic Psychology, 23(1):143-158

Concern: A Comparative Look

Rami Tolmacz, Ph.D.

The concept of concern has received very little attention in the psychoanalytic literature. Aside from Winnicott's “The Development of the Capacity for Concern(1963), based on Kleinian approach, the subject has scarcely been addressed from an empirical or theoretical standpoint. Here an attempt is made to consider the concept from the perspective of 2 object relations theories that have come out against the classical approach: attachment theory and Suttie's theory. The paper also looks at Winnicott's thinking on the subject, from association with guilt to association with joy, as well as the association with intersubjective approaches. There follows a discussion of 4 points: motivation, nature versus nurture, time of appearance, and the object. Finally, several points are raised regarding related interpersonal and intrapersonal issues.

[This is a summary or excerpt from the full text of the book or article. The full text of the document is available to subscribers.]

Copyright © 2020, Psychoanalytic Electronic Publishing, ISSN 2472-6982 Customer Service | Help | FAQ | Download PEP Bibliography | Report a Data Error | About

WARNING! This text is printed for personal use. It is copyright to the journal in which it originally appeared. It is illegal to redistribute it in any form.