Customer Service | Help | FAQ | PEP-Easy | Report a Data Error | About
:
Login
Tip: To see translations of this article…

PEP-Web Tip of the Day

When there are translations of the current article, you will see a flag/pennant icon next to the title, like this: 2015-11-06_11h14_24 For example:

2015-11-06_11h09_55

Click on it and you will see a bibliographic list of papers that are published translations of the current article. Note that when no published translations are available, you can also translate an article on the fly using Google translate.

 

For the complete list of tips, see PEP-Web Tips on the PEP-Web support page.

Whipple, R. Fowler, J.C. (2011). Affect, Relationship Schemas, and Social Cognition: Self-Injuring Borderline Personality Disorder Inpatients. Psychoanal. Psychol., 28(2):183-195.

(2011). Psychoanalytic Psychology, 28(2):183-195

Research

Affect, Relationship Schemas, and Social Cognition: Self-Injuring Borderline Personality Disorder Inpatients

Rachel Whipple, PsyD and J. Christopher Fowler

Psychiatric patients who engage in nonsuicidal self-injury (NSSI) present specific challenges to therapists because they often lack the capacities necessary to understand the social and emotional triggers for their actions. This case-control study empirically explores psychodynamic concepts of NSSI by examining quality of affect, object representations, and social cognition manifest in verbatim Thematic Apperception Test narratives (Murray, 1943). Sixty-five female borderline inpatients engaging in NSSI served as the case group, while 68 matched female inpatients with BPD without NSSI served as the control group. The TAT transcripts were rated on the Social Cognition and Object Relations Scale (Hilsenroth, Stein, & Pinsker, 2007; Westen, 1995), then a priori hypotheses were subjected to statistical analysis. While both groups functioned in the pathological range on all dimensions, the NSSI group created narratives reflecting greater expectation of malevolent treatment from others, expressed interpersonal relationships in more shallow terms with little capacity for empathy, and had greater difficulty modulating aggressive feelings. Their narratives also reflected greater difficulty with splitting and boundary confusion, more primitive relationship schemas, and poorer understanding of social causality of interpersonal interactions. Results add to a growing body of evidence that NSSI is associated with more severe forms of BPD pathology, especially in domains of malevolent object representations, misinterpretation of social interactions, and expressions of hostility (Kernberg, 1984; Simpson & Porter, 1981; Stolorow & Lachmann, 1980; Yeomans, Hull & Clarkin, 1994). These results extend observations of the heterogeneity in the severity of patients diagnosed with BPD.

[This is a summary or excerpt from the full text of the book or article. The full text of the document is available to subscribers.]

Copyright © 2019, Psychoanalytic Electronic Publishing, ISSN 2472-6982 Customer Service | Help | FAQ | Download PEP Bibliography | Report a Data Error | About

WARNING! This text is printed for personal use. It is copyright to the journal in which it originally appeared. It is illegal to redistribute it in any form.