|Mcdonald, A. (1995). The Freud-Klein Controversies 1941-45. Edited by P King R Steiner No.11 in the New Library of Psychoanalysis ed. Spillius. Tavistock/Routledge. Pp. xxv + 966. £35.00 (paper).. Psychoanal. Psychother., 9:213-213.|
Viewing the full text of this document requires a subscription to PEP Web.
If you are coming in from a university from a registered IP address or secure referral page you should not need to log in. Contact your university librarian in the event of problems.
If you have a personal subscription on your own account or through a Society or Institute please put your username and password in the box below. Any difficulties should be reported to your group administrator.
(1995). Psychoanalytic Psychotherapy, 9(2):213-213
The Freud-Klein Controversies 1941-45. Edited by P King R Steiner No.11 in the New Library of Psychoanalysis ed. Spillius. Tavistock/Routledge. Pp. xxv + 966. £35.00 (paper).
This is a unique record of a coming-of-age of an organisation, a task which has been approached with maturity and . The reader has a feeling of a ‘fly on the wall’, with enough background of a factual nature, but also interpersonal and information in abundance, which does credit to . Thus therapists’ motivations and problems have been put under the spotlight bravely, as honestly as one could hope for, and without rancour. It is not a gossipy read.
This is a credible into an organisational dilemma that we might all recognise as an occurrence of monotonous regularity in different guises. How often, however, are we in a to view the whole in such a way, either at the time, or after it has all blown over? How often is a verbatim account of exchanges taken?
Part of the uniqueness of this is as a result of the participants’ about the ; the entitling of the discussions as scientific; the degree to which the debate was creative; and the interaction between the participants’ personal experiences and their . The book also stands on its own as a text for the understanding of concepts such as , enriched by the detailed argument.
So to whom would I recommend this tome? Well, even in the paperback form, it is quite a size, but it would be my advice not to be daunted. It is an easy book to dip into and has been sufficiently divided into sections to make possible circumscribed reading as desired.
I found it of interest in three particular areas. I would recommend it to anyone with a passing interest in the of the important figures of ; also, but quite separately, to those engaged in, or interested in, the dynamics of institutions or organisations; quite specifically, again, to anyone wishing a greater understanding of some key concepts formulated at that time. Of course, these interests often overlap, and for the intrepid, the book, in its entirety, makes a good read. There is plenty to think about and plenty to debate.
Does it have a happy ending? Well, that's a matter for !
- 213 -
[This is a summary or excerpt from the full text of the book or article. The full text of the document is available to subscribers.]