Login
Whyte, N. (2004). Review of the Literature. Psychoanal. Psychother., 18:15-26.

Welcome to PEP Web!

Viewing the full text of this document requires a subscription to PEP Web.

If you are coming in from a university from a registered IP address or secure referral page you should not need to log in. Contact your university librarian in the event of problems.

If you have a personal subscription on your own account or through a Society or Institute please put your username and password in the box below. Any difficulties should be reported to your group administrator.

Username:
Password:

Can't remember your username and/or password? If you have forgotten your username and/or password please click here and log in to the PaDS database. Once there you need to fill in your email address (this must be the email address that PEP has on record for you) and click "Send." Your username and password will be sent to this email address within a few minutes. If this does not work for you please contact your group organizer.

Athens or federation user? Login here.

Not already a subscriber? Order a subscription today.

(2004). Psychoanalytic Psychotherapy, 18:15-26

Review of the Literature

Nollaig Whyte Author Information

The first paper written about the effects of the analyst's pregnancy on her patients was by Hannet (1949). In this paper the author described the responses of several of her patients to her miscarriage and she reported that each of her patients reacted in the transference according to their individual psychopathology and investment in the treatment. Some 17 years elapsed before there was another paper on the subject. Van Leeuwen wrote in 1966 about one male patient's response to her pregnancy, as an illustration of the rarely acknowledged phenomenon of pregnancy envy in men (Van Leeuwen 1966). In 1969, Lax offered a substantial paper in which she noted the striking paucity of a discussion on this topic in the psychoanalytic literature to date. She went on to describe the specificity of the responses of six of her patients to this special event in the analysis. Like Hannet (1949), she observed that these responses were linked with ‘the reactivation of those aspects of the infantile conflict which were most significant for the development of (the patient's) pathology’ (Lax 1969). The reactions of male and female patients were noted to be different. Male patients showed a relative paucity of responses and denied the existence of the pregnancy for much longer than female patients. When they did acknowledge it, this recognition was followed by ‘minor turbulence in the transference’ and isolation was used as the main mechanism of defence. For the women, the pregnancy evoked ‘a profound transference storm’ and identification with the analyst was the most commonly used defence. Lax (1969) postulated that these gender differences were related to the different psychosexual development in boys and girls. Finally Lax addressed potential countertransference reactions that are more likely to appear at this time in the treatment, stemming from the analyst's own personal history of her response to pregnancy. She spoke of the need to be aware of these countertransference responses in order to be able to guard against them!

In these early papers the authors were suggesting that the event of the therapist's pregnancy largely constituted an interference in the treatment process. It heightened separation anxieties and symbiotic longings and apart from intensifying the particular transference pattern, it was felt to have little therapeutic importance.

- 15 -

[This is a summary or excerpt from the full text of the book or article. The full text of the document is available to subscribers.]

Copyright © 2014, Psychoanalytic Electronic Publishing. Help | About | Download PEP Bibliography | Report a Problem

WARNING! This text is printed for the personal use of the subscriber to PEP Web and is copyright to the Journal in which it originally appeared. It is illegal to copy, distribute or circulate it in any form whatsoever.