Customer Service | Help | FAQ | PEP-Easy | Report a Data Error | About
Tip: To receive notifications about new content…

PEP-Web Tip of the Day

Want to receive notifications about new content in PEP Web? For more information about this feature, click here

To sign up to PEP Web Alert for weekly emails with new content updates click click here.

For the complete list of tips, see PEP-Web Tips on the PEP-Web support page.

Jelliffe, S.E. (1914). Technique of Psychoanalysis. Psychoanal. Rev., 1(2):178-186.

(1914). Psychoanalytic Review, 1(2):178-186

Technique of Psychoanalysis

Smith Ely Jelliffe, M.D., Ph.D.

In the domain of gastro-intestinal disturbances one constantly meets with this interrelationship of the physical and psychical. In the great majority of cases, the analyst sees the patient only after many months of ineffectual gastro-enteric therapy. Under such circumstances the need for analysis is obvious. Gastrointestinal references are the most frequent in the psychoneuroses. “Man lives to eat” and probably more libido enters into the average man's gastronomic ceremonials than into any other type of expression. It is not to be wondered at, therefore, that the “stomach” should play such a large part in the neuroses and that such a mass of ignorance and superstition should still be found in all classes of society relative to the nutritive instinct. Extremely primitive and animistic notions concerning the food function and the processes of digestion, still hold sway even among physicians. The dietary fads of the latter have been subjects for ridicule and satire for years and not without a certain measure of justification. Concerning these and the general subject of the nutritive instinct more will be said later.

Before passing to the consideration of the detailed history of the patient which is necessary from the psychoanalytic standpoint, attention should first be directed to those types of patients who should not be analyzed.

what patients not to analyze

Perhaps the most important thing for the beginner to know is what not to analyze. Even the trained analyst may find to his distress that he has unwisely started a psychoanalytic procedure to learn later that the method in general will not bring about the hoped for result, i. e., the betterment of the patient.

Experience is rapidly accumulating relative to this matter and it is my purpose to discuss the bearings of this experience in the following paragraphs.

[This is a summary or excerpt from the full text of the book or article. The full text of the document is available to subscribers.]

Copyright © 2020, Psychoanalytic Electronic Publishing, ISSN 2472-6982 Customer Service | Help | FAQ | Download PEP Bibliography | Report a Data Error | About

WARNING! This text is printed for personal use. It is copyright to the journal in which it originally appeared. It is illegal to redistribute it in any form.