Customer Service | Help | FAQ | PEP-Easy | Report a Data Error | About
:
Login
Tip: To sort articles by sourceā€¦

PEP-Web Tip of the Day

After you perform a search, you can sort the articles by Source. This will rearrange the results of your search, displaying articles according to their appearance in journals and books. This feature is useful for tracing psychoanalytic concepts in a specific psychoanalytic tradition.

For the complete list of tips, see PEP-Web Tips on the PEP-Web support page.

Ehrenwald, J. (1960). Schizophrenia, Neurotic Compliance and the PSI Hypothesis. Psychoanal. Rev., 47B(2):43-54.

(1960). Psychoanalytic Review, 47B(2):43-54

Schizophrenia, Neurotic Compliance and the PSI Hypothesis

Jan Ehrenwald

Telepathy has been defined as the sharing by one person of another person's mental processes without the aid of sensory channels, rational inferences, parallel reasoning, or the like. Modern parapsychology studies occurrences of this type—including so-called clairvoyance, precognition, psychokinesis—under the heading of psi phenomena. It introduced this term in order to dissociate itself from the welter of pre-scientific or frankly superstitious concepts which have been attached to such phenomena from ancient times.

But the fact is that popular belief in telepathy and related phenomena is still steeped in the tradition of primitive magic and demonology. Worse still, some of the most enthusiastic supporters of modern parapsychological theories are recruited from the ranks of paranoid schizophrenics to whom the possibility of action and interaction at a distance, of “thought reading” and “thought transference” seems to be a matter of everyday experience. The schizophrenic is committed to an essentially magic mode of existence, and G. Roheim 12 described schizophrenia as the magic psychosis par excellence. In effect, some of the paranoid patient's delusional claims might well be considered as distorted versions of the telepathy hypothesis held by the parapsychologists of our day—an admittedly embarrassing consensus of opinions.

What

[This is a summary or excerpt from the full text of the book or article. The full text of the document is available to subscribers.]

Copyright © 2020, Psychoanalytic Electronic Publishing, ISSN 2472-6982 Customer Service | Help | FAQ | Download PEP Bibliography | Report a Data Error | About

WARNING! This text is printed for personal use. It is copyright to the journal in which it originally appeared. It is illegal to redistribute it in any form.