Customer Service | Help | FAQ | Report a Data Error | About
:
Login
Tip: To sort articles by Rank…

PEP-Web Tip of the Day

You can specify Rank as the sort order when searching (it’s the default) which will put the articles which best matched your search on the top, and the complete results in descending relevance to your search.    This feature is useful for finding the most important articles on a specific topic.

You can also change the sort order of results by selecting rank at the top of the search results pane after you perform a search.  Note that rank order after a search only ranks up to 1000 maximum results that were returned; specifying rank in the search dialog ranks all possibilities before choosing the final 1000 (or less) to return.

For the complete list of tips, see PEP-Web Tips on the PEP-Web support page.

Rappaport, E.A. (1976). Notes on Blindness and Omniscience: From Oedipus to Hitler. Psychoanal. Rev., 63(2):281-289.

(1976). Psychoanalytic Review, 63(2):281-289

Notes on Blindness and Omniscience: From Oedipus to Hitler

Ernest A. Rappaport

In developing his theory of the Oedipus complex, Freud associated blindness with castration and interpreted the self-blinding of King Oedipus as symbolic of self-castration, a self-inflicted punishment for his incestuous sexual relationship with his mother. Thus he equated blindness with impotence, and this equation served him well in the elaboration of his theory of impotence as a neurotic symptom. Commensurate with Freud's search for the origin of the individual neurosis in infancy was his search for the source of the pathology in social anthropology in the literary products of the archaic ages, in mythology. His findings once again proved useful in the pursuit of his psychoanalytic studies of the individual.

In mythology it was, above all, the inquisitiveness of the human eye which enraged the gods because it threatened their prerogatives. The punishment of blindness, then, is not specific for Oedipal desires but often represents a retaliation of the gods for the even greater arrogance of competing with them in vision and knowledge. In ancient customs the blind were treated as if they deserved their misfortune as punishment for immodest ambitions. The wicked people of Sodom were struck blind because of their sins, and when David besieged the Jebusites of Jerusalem he took stringent measures against the blind. As outcasts of society, the blind were kept quarantined outside the city gates. In some parts of India the blind are given no organized assistance because blindness is considered a punishment for major sins in one's previous existence. Even in Western countries parents may unconsciously feel that their child was punished with blindness because of their own sins, and they reject the child as an unwelcome reminder. Seligman10 reports that in Würzburg in the

- 281 -

[This is a summary or excerpt from the full text of the book or article. The full text of the document is available to subscribers.]

Copyright © 2017, Psychoanalytic Electronic Publishing, ISSN 2472-6982 Customer Service | Help | FAQ | Download PEP Bibliography | Report a Data Error | About

WARNING! This text is printed for personal use. It is copyright to the journal in which it originally appeared. It is illegal to redistribute it in any form.