Customer Service | Help | FAQ | PEP-Easy | Report a Data Error | About
:
Login
Tip: You can request more content in your language…

PEP-Web Tip of the Day

Would you like more of PEP’s content in your own language?  We encourage you to talk with your country’s Psychoanalytic Journals and tell them about PEP Web.

For the complete list of tips, see PEP-Web Tips on the PEP-Web support page.

Mollinger, S. (1979). The Divided Self in Nathaniel Hawthorne and D. H. Lawrence. Psychoanal. Rev., 66(1):79-102.
    

(1979). Psychoanalytic Review, 66(1):79-102

The Divided Self in Nathaniel Hawthorne and D. H. Lawrence

Shernaz Mollinger, Ph.D.

I

In his essay on Nathaniel Hawthorne in Studies in Classic American Literature D. H. Lawrence declares:

Nowadays men do hate the idea of dualism. It's no good, dual we are. The cross. If we accept the symbol then virtually we accept the fact. We are divided against ourselves.24a

The statement characterizes both subject and author. The dualism that Lawrence sees in Hawthorne is quite as apparent in himself. If any element links the fiction of Hawthorne and Lawrence, it is not Hawthorne's influence on Lawrence or Lawrence's criticism of Hawthorne but the striking affinity of the two writers' imaginations. The most obvious characteristic of this similarity is the necessity of both to describe experience in terms of antitheses, of irreconcilable opposites that nevertheless must somehow be reconciled or transcended.

This tendency toward dualism, and the either-or, black-and-white attitude to the world it implies, although pursued by their literary admirers, is not often discussed by either writer's psychological critics. Psychological studies have tended to concentrate overwhelmingly on the Oedipal aspects of their lives and novels. For example, the title of Frederick Crews's book on Hawthorne, The Sins of the Fathers, is an immediate intimation of his thesis that Hawthorne's “plots depict with incredible fidelity the results of an unresolved Oedipal conflict.”5 Similarly, from its earliest publication (when, as Catherine Carswell said, Lawrence was “pounced upon by the psychoanalysts”), Sons and Lovers has been usually considered to depict the classic Oedipal conflict.2,17,40

[This is a summary or excerpt from the full text of the book or article. The full text of the document is available to subscribers.]

Copyright © 2019, Psychoanalytic Electronic Publishing, ISSN 2472-6982 Customer Service | Help | FAQ | Download PEP Bibliography | Report a Data Error | About

WARNING! This text is printed for personal use. It is copyright to the journal in which it originally appeared. It is illegal to redistribute it in any form.